Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33243808›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Utilisation of diagnostics in India: a rapid ethnographic study exploring context and behaviour.

Bronwen Holloway, Aditya Mathur, Ashish Pathak, Anna Bergström

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Hidden systems in primary care cancer detection: an embedded qualitative intervention development study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bronwen HollowayDepartment of Womens and Childrens Health, Uppsala Global Health Research on Implementation and Sustainability, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden bronwen.holloway@kbh.uu.se.ORCID 0000-0001-7033-0572
Aditya MathurDepartment of Pediatrics, Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, India.
Ashish PathakDepartment of Pediatrics, Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, India.
Anna BergströmDepartment of Womens and Childrens Health, Uppsala Global Health Research on Implementation and Sustainability, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SERuxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore factors that influence behaviour in the utilisation of diagnostics by caregivers of sick children. Utilisation is defined as a caregiver assisting a child to get diagnostic tests done and return for follow-up of results. Understanding these experiences may help inform the development of interventions and implementation strategies to improve the use of diagnostics, thereby target treatment and optimise antibiotic use.

designA rapid ethnographic qualitative study using 3 months of unstructured observations, 1 month of structured observations of diagnostic utilisation and 43 semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were coded and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Findings were explored from a behavioural perspective through the lens of the 'Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour' (COM-B) model for understanding behaviour. The multiple methods of investigation applied allowed for triangulation and cross-validation of the findings.

settingThe paediatric outpatient department of a teaching hospital in rural, central India.

participantsCaregivers of sick children attending the paediatric outpatient department who were sent for one or more diagnostic test.

resultsThree key themes were identified that influenced caregivers' behaviour. Caregivers trusted and understood the importance of diagnostics but their acceptance wavered depending on the severity of illness and preference to treat their child directly with medicines. Caregivers struggled to access diagnostics, describing delays in testing, receiving results and follow-up, further complicated by travel time, distance and competing priorities such as work. Diagnostics were relatively cheap compared with other healthcare facilities however, the cost of the test, travel expenses and wages lost for missing work, were barriers to getting the tests done and returning for follow-up.

conclusionsDiagnostics are generally accepted and their purpose understood, however, the organisation of diagnostic services, direct and indirect costs hinder caregivers from using diagnostics. Improvements in accessibility and affordability may increase caregiver motivation to use diagnostics and return for follow-up.

Indexed as

CaregiversAnthropology, CulturalBehaviorChildFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMotivationQualitative Researchdiagnostic microbiologydiagnostic radiologyinfectious diseasespaediatricsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID33243808
PMCPMC7692986
OpenAlexW3108850476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.