Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33243805›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

The Schulthess local Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry (SAR): cohort profile.

Alex Marzel, Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer, Christoph Kolling, Fabrizio Moro, Matthias Flury, Michael C Glanzmann, Christian Jung, Barbara Wirth, Beatrice Weber, Beat Simmen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alex Marzel *Research, Teaching and Development, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4795-6224
Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer *Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christoph KollingShoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.
Fabrizio MoroShoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matthias FluryCenter for Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, In Motion, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael C GlanzmannShoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian JungShoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.
Barbara WirthShoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.
Beatrice WeberResearch, Teaching and Development, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.
Beat SimmenEndoclinic, Hirslanden Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Markus ScheibelShoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.
Laurent AudigéResearch, Teaching and Development, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland laurent.audige@kws.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-3962-3996

Funding

OSELS CDC HHS U47 OE000001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeClinical registries are essential for evaluation of surgical outcomes. The Schulthess Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry (SAR) was established in 2006 to evaluate safety, function, quality-of-life and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.

participantsAdult patients undergoing anatomic or reverse shoulder joint replacement at the Schulthess Klinik, a high-volume, leading orthopaedic surgery centre in Zürich, Switzerland. FINDINGS TO DATE: Between March 2006 and December 2019, the registry covered 98% of eligible operations. Overall, 2332 patients were enrolled with a total of 2796 operations and 11 147 person-years of follow-up. Mean age at baseline was 71 (range: 20-95), 65% were women. Most common indication was rotator cuff tears with osteoarthritis (42%) and the mean preoperative Constant Score was 31 (±15). The most frequent arthroplasty type was reverse, increasing from 61% in 2006-2010 to 86% in 2015-2019. Functional recovery peaked at 12-month postoperatively and did not show a clinically relevant deterioration during the first ten follow-up years. Since its establishment, the registry was used to address multiple pertinent clinical and methodological questions. Primary focus was on comparing different implant configurations (eg, glenosphere diameter) and surgical techniques (eg, latissimus dorsi transfer) to maximise functional recovery. Additionally, the cohort contributed to the determination of the clinical relevance and validity of radiological monitoring of cortical bone resorption and scapular notching. Finally, SAR data helped to demonstrate that returning to sports was among key patient expectations after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. FUTURE PLANS: As first patients are approaching the 15 years follow-up landmark, the registry will continue providing essential data on long-term functional outcomes, implant stability, revision rates and aetiologies as well as patient satisfaction and quality-of-life. In addition to research and quality-control, the cohort data will be brought back to the patients by bolstering real-time clinical decision support.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderShoulder JointAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularRegistriesRetrospective StudiesSwitzerlandTreatment Outcomeadult orthopaedicsepidemiologyhealth informaticsorthopaedic sports traumaorthopaedic & trauma surgeryshoulder

Identifiers

PMID33243805
PMCPMC7692837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.