Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33243368›Full record

Trial reportHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2020

Adding web-based behavioural support to exercise referral schemes for inactive adults with chronic health conditions: the e-coachER RCT.

Adrian H Taylor, Rod S Taylor, Wendy M Ingram, Nana Anokye, Sarah Dean, Kate Jolly, Nanette Mutrie, Jeffrey Lambert, Lucy Yardley, Colin Greaves and 17 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review and narrative synthesis of physical activity referral schemes' components.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Adrian H TaylorFaculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2701-9468
Rod S TaylorUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3043-6011
Wendy M IngramFaculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0182-9462
Nana AnokyeDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3615-344X
Sarah DeanUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3682-5149
Kate JollyInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6224-2115
Nanette MutriePhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5018-6398
Jeffrey LambertUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4774-9054
Lucy YardleySchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3853-883X
Colin GreavesUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4425-2691
Jennie KingFaculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7571-6829
Chloe McAdamPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7574-7489
Mary SteeleCentre for Applications of Health Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2595-3855
Lisa PriceUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9478-3488
Adam StreeterFaculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9921-2369
Nigel Charles
Rohini TerryUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4188-8504
Douglas WebbFaculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6818-1838
John CampbellUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6752-3493
Lucy HughesInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6015-0356
Ben AinsworthCentre for Applications of Health Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5098-1092
Ben JonesFaculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7374-1107
Ben JaneSchool of Sport, Health and Wellbeing, Plymouth Marjon University, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0774-2942
Jo ErwinBone and Joint Research Group, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9648-4825
Paul LittleCentre for Applications of Health Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3664-1873
Anthony WoolfBone and Joint Research Group, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8482-8056
Chris CavanaghPPI representative, Plymouth, UK.
University of Exeter · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBRoyal Cornwall Hospital Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBBrunel University of London · GBPlymouth Marjon University · GB

Funding

Department of Health 13/25/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is modest evidence that exercise referral schemes increase physical activity in inactive individuals with chronic health conditions. There is a need to identify additional ways to improve the effects of exercise referral schemes on long-term physical activity.

objectivesTo determine if adding the e-coachER intervention to exercise referral schemes is more clinically effective and cost-effective in increasing physical activity after 1 year than usual exercise referral schemes.

designA pragmatic, multicentre, two-arm randomised controlled trial, with a mixed-methods process evaluation and health economic analysis. Participants were allocated in a 1 : 1 ratio to either exercise referral schemes plus e-coachER (intervention) or exercise referral schemes alone (control).

settingPatients were referred to exercise referral schemes in Plymouth, Birmingham and Glasgow.

participantsThere were 450 participants aged 16-74 years, with a body mass index of 30-40 kg/m

interventione-coachER was designed to augment exercise referral schemes. Participants received a pedometer and fridge magnet with physical activity recording sheets, and a user guide to access the web-based support in the form of seven 'steps to health'. e-coachER aimed to build the use of behavioural skills (e.g. self-monitoring) while strengthening favourable beliefs in the importance of physical activity, competence, autonomy in physical activity choices and relatedness. All participants were referred to a standard exercise referral scheme. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity in ≥ 10-minute bouts measured by an accelerometer over 1 week at 12 months, worn ≥ 16 hours per day for ≥ 4 days including ≥ 1 weekend day. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Other accelerometer-derived physical activity measures, self-reported physical activity, exercise referral scheme attendance and EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores were collected at 4 and 12 months post randomisation.

resultsParticipants had a mean body mass index of 32.6 (standard deviation) 4.4 kg/m LIMITATIONS: A significant proportion (46%) of participants were not included in the primary analysis because of study withdrawal and insufficient device wear-time, so the results must be interpreted with caution. The regression model fit for the primary outcome was poor because of the considerable proportion of participants [142/243 (58%)] who recorded no instances of ≥ 10-minute bouts of moderate and vigorous physical activity at 12 months post randomisation. FUTURE WORK: The design and rigorous evaluation of cost-effective and scalable ways to increase exercise referral scheme uptake and maintenance of moderate and vigorous physical activity are needed among patients with chronic conditions.

conclusionsAdding e-coachER to usual exercise referral schemes had only a weak indicative effect on long-term rigorously defined, objectively assessed moderate and vigorous physical activity. The provision of the e-coachER support package led to an additional cost and has a 63% probability of being cost-effective based on the UK threshold of £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. The intervention did improve some process outcomes as specified in our logic model.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN15644451.

fundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in

Indexed as

ExerciseAccelerometryAdolescentAdultAgedChronic DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMentoringMiddle AgedQuality of LifeReferral and ConsultationSedentary BehaviorACCELEROMETERCOST-EFFECTIVENESSDEPRESSIONDIABETESE-HEALTHEXERCISEHYPERTENSIONOBESITYOSTEOARTHRITISPRIMARY CARE

Identifiers

PMID33243368
PMCPMC7750864
OpenAlexW3106690694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.