Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33243300›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

StudiCare mindfulness-study protocol of a randomized controlled trial evaluating an internet- and mobile-based intervention for college students with no and "on demand" guidance.

Ann-Marie Küchler, Dana Schultchen, Olga Pollatos, Morten Moshagen, David D Ebert, Harald Baumeister

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Three-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness, Acceptance, and Negative Effects ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ann-Marie KüchlerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute for Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 47, 89081, Ulm, Germany. ann-marie.kuechler@uni-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3305-4892
Dana SchultchenDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Olga PollatosDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Morten MoshagenDepartment of Quantitative Methods in Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
David D EbertDepartment of Clinical, Neuro- & Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Harald BaumeisterDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute for Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 47, 89081, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollege is an exciting but also challenging time with an increased risk for mental health issues. Only a minority of the college students concerned get professional help, a problem that might be improvable by internet- and mobile-based interventions (IMIs). However, adherence of IMIs is a concern. While guidance might be a solution, it is resource-intensive, derailing potential implementation on population level. The first aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of the IMI StudiCare Mindfulness (StudiCare-M) for college students with "on demand" and no guidance. The second aim is to examine potential moderators and mediators, contributing to the questions of "how" and "for whom" such interventions work.

methodsIn this three-armed randomized controlled trial, both an unguided and "guidance on demand" (GoD) condition of StudiCare-M are compared to a waitlist control group. StudiCare-M is based on principles of acceptance and commitment therapy and stress management and consists of 7 modules plus two booster sessions. Participants in the GoD condition may ask their e-coach for support whenever needed. A total of 387 college students with moderate to low mindfulness are recruited at 15+ cooperating universities in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland via circular emails. Assessments take place before as well as 1, 2, and 6 months after randomization. The primary outcome is mindfulness. Secondary outcomes include stress, depression, anxiety, interoception, presenteeism, wellbeing, intervention satisfaction, adherence, and potential side effects. Among examined moderators and mediators are sociodemographic variables, pre-treatment symptomatology, treatment expectancy, self-efficacy, cognitive fusion, emotion regulation, and alexithymia. All data will be analyzed according to intention-to-treat (ITT) principles. DISCUSSION: Providing effective interventions to help college students become more resilient can make a valuable contribution to the health and functionality of future society. If effective under the condition of minimal or no guidance, StudiCare-M offers a low-threshold potentially resource-efficient possibility to enhance college student mental health on a population level. Moderation- and mediation analyses will deliver further insights for optimization of target groups and intervention content.

trial registrationWHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform via the German Clinical Studies Trial Register DRKS00014774 . Registered on 18 May 2018.

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyInternetMindfulnessAustriaGermanyHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStudentsSwitzerlandUniversitiesAnxietyCollege studentsDepressionEfficacyE-healthGuidance on demandInternet- and mobile-based interventionsMindfulnessModerators and mediatorsUniversity students

Identifiers

PMID33243300
PMCPMC7691111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.