Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33243238›Full record

ReviewJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2020

Traditional medicinal plants in South Tyrol (northern Italy, southern Alps): biodiversity and use.

Joshua Petelka, Barbara Plagg, Ina Säumel, Stefan Zerbe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dentistry journal · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Unveiling the Pharmacognostic Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chemodiversity of Arctic PlantPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua PetelkaFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Barbara PlaggFaculty of Education, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Ina SäumelIntegrative Research Institute on Transformations of Human-Environment Systems (IRITHESys), Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. ina.saeumel@hu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9099-8182
Stefan ZerbeFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorldwide mountain regions are recognized as hotspots of ethnopharmacologically relevant species diversity. In South Tyrol (Southern Alps, Italy), and due to the region's high plant diversity and isolated population, a unique traditional botanical knowledge of medicinal plants has flourished, which traces its history back to prehistoric times. However, changes in rural life and culture may threaten this unique biodiversity and cultural heritage. Our study aims to collect and analyze information on native plants used in traditional folk medicine, focusing on the preservation of botanical and cultural diversity.

methodsData were collected through a review of published material that documents traditionally used medicinal plants of South Tyrol in order to capture the total diversity of plants and their usage. We evaluated different parameters, comprising the ethnobotanicity index (EI), ethnophytonomic index (EPI), relative frequency of citation (RFC), red list status, and regional legislation with regard to the plant species.

resultsA total of 276 species, including 3 mushrooms and 3 lichens, were identified. These belonged to 72 families, most frequently to the Asteraceae, Rosaceae, and Lamiaceae. The most frequently cited species were Hypericum perforatum L., Urtica dioica L., and Plantago lanceolata L. According to 12 ICPC-2 disease categories, the most frequently treated human health symptoms were from the digestive and respiratory systems as well as the skin. A total of 27 species were listed as endangered, of which 16 are not protected and two are now already extinct. Among the 59 predominantly alpine species, 11 species are restricted to the high altitudes of the Alps and may be threatened by global warming.

conclusionsOur research revealed that the ethnobotanical richness of South Tyrol is among the highest in Italy and throughout the Alps. Nevertheless, it is evident that biodiversity and traditional knowledge have been heavily eroded. Furthermore, we point out particularly sensitive species that should be reconsidered for stronger protections in legal regulations.

Indexed as

BiodiversityMedicine, TraditionalPhytotherapyPlants, MedicinalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansItalySurveys and QuestionnairesEcosystem restorationHuman healthNature conservationTraditional ecological knowledgeTraditional medicine

Identifiers

PMID33243238
PMCPMC7690129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.