Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33243222›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2020

Influences on participation in a programme addressing loneliness among people with depression and anxiety: findings from the Community Navigator Study.

Johanna Frerichs, Jo Billings, Nick Barber, Anjie Chhapia, Beverley Chipp, Prisha Shah, Anna Shorten, Theodora Stefanidou, Sonia Johnson, Brynmor Lloyd Evans and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Thematic Synthesis of the Experiences of Social Prescribing Among Patients in the UK.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna FrerichsMcPin Foundation, 7-14 Great Dover Street, London, SE1 4YR, UK.
Jo BillingsDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Nick BarberMcPin Foundation, 7-14 Great Dover Street, London, SE1 4YR, UK.
Anjie ChhapiaMcPin Foundation, 7-14 Great Dover Street, London, SE1 4YR, UK.
Beverley ChippMcPin Foundation, 7-14 Great Dover Street, London, SE1 4YR, UK.
Prisha ShahMcPin Foundation, 7-14 Great Dover Street, London, SE1 4YR, UK.
Anna ShortenComplex Depression, Anxiety & Trauma Team, St Pancras Hospital, London, NW1 0PE, UK.
Theodora StefanidouDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Sonia JohnsonDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Brynmor Lloyd EvansDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Vanessa PinfoldMcPin Foundation, 7-14 Great Dover Street, London, SE1 4YR, UK. vanessapinfold@mcpin.org.ORCID 0000-0003-3007-8805
McPin Foundation · GBUniversity College London · GBSt Pancras Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoneliness is associated with negative outcomes, including increased mortality and is common among people with mental health problems. This qualitative study, which was carried out as part of a feasibility trial, aimed to understand what enables and hinders people with severe depression and/or anxiety under the care of secondary mental health services in the United Kingdom to participate in the Community Navigator programme, and make progress with feelings of depression, anxiety and loneliness. The programme consisted of up to ten meetings with a Community Navigator and three optional group sessions.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were carried out with participants (n = 19) shortly after programme completion. A co-produced two-stage qualitative approach, involving narrative and reflexive thematic analysis, was undertaken by members of the study's working group, which included experts by experience, clinicians and researchers.

resultsThe narrative analysis showed that individuals have varied goals, hold mixed feelings about meeting other people and define progress differently. From the thematic analysis, six themes were identified that explained facilitators and challenges to participating in the programme: desire to connect with others; individual social confidence; finding something meaningful to do; the accessibility of resources locally; the timing of the programme; and the participant's relationship with the Community Navigator.

conclusionsWe found that people with severe depression and/or anxiety supported by secondary mental health services may want to address feelings of loneliness but find it emotionally effortful to do so and a major personal challenge. This emotional effort, which manifests in individuals differently, can make it hard for participants to engage with a loneliness programme, though it was through facing personal challenges that a significant sense of achievement was felt. Factors at the individual, interpersonal and structural level, that enable or hinder an individual's participation should be identified early, so that people are able to make the best use out of the Community Navigator or other similar programmes.

Indexed as

DepressionLonelinessAnxietyAnxiety DisordersHumansUnited KingdomAnxietyCo-productionDepressionLonelinessQualitative researchSocial inclusion

Identifiers

PMID33243222
PMCPMC7689977
OpenAlexW3108600033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.