Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33243207›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Engaging community health workers in maternal and infant death identification in Khayelitsha, South Africa: a pilot study.

Jude Igumbor, Olatunji Adetokunboh, Jocelyn Muller, Edna N Bosire, Ademola Ajuwon, Rene Phetlhu, Marjorie Mbule, Agnes Ronan, Fiona Burtt, Esca Scheepers and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jude IgumborSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. jude.igumbor@wits.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3324-7654
Olatunji Adetokunbohmothers2mothers, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jocelyn Mullermothers2mothers, Cape Town, South Africa.
Edna N BosireSouth African Medical Research Council Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit (DPHRU), School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Ademola AjuwonDepartment of Health Promotion and Education, Faculty of Public Health, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Rene PhetlhuSchool of Nursing, University of the Western Cape, Belville, Cape Town, South Africa.
Marjorie Mbulemothers2mothers, Cape Town, South Africa.
Agnes Ronanmothers2mothers, Cape Town, South Africa.
Fiona Burttmothers2mothers, Cape Town, South Africa.
Esca Scheepersmothers2mothers, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kathrin Schmitzmothers2mothers, Cape Town, South Africa.
South African Medical Research Council · ZAStellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of Ibadan · NGUniversity of the Western Cape · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEngaging community health workers in a formalised death review process through verbal and social autopsy has been utilised in different settings to estimate the burden and causes of mortality, where civil registration and vital statistics systems are weak. This method has not been widely adopted. We piloted the use of trained community health workers (CHW) to investigate the extent of unreported maternal and infant deaths in Khayelitsha and explored requirements of such a programme and the role of CHWs in bridging gaps.

methodsThis was a mixed methods study, incorporating both qualitative and quantitative methods. Case identification and data collection were done by ten trained CHWs. Quantitative data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Qualitative data were collected using semi-structured interview guides for key informant interviews, focus group discussions and informal conversations. Qualitative data were analysed thematically using a content analysis approach.

resultsAlthough more than half of the infant deaths occurred in hospitals (n = 11/17), about a quarter that occurred at home (n = 4/17) were unreported. Main causes of deaths as perceived by family members of the deceased were related to uncertainty about the quality of care in the facilities, socio-cultural and economic contexts where people lived and individual factors. Most unreported deaths were further attributed to weak facility-community links and socio-cultural practices. Fragmented death reporting systems were perceived to influence the quality of the data and this impacted on the number of unreported deaths. Only two maternal deaths were identified in this pilot study.

conclusionsCHWs can conduct verbal and social autopsy for maternal and infant deaths to complement formal vital registration systems. Capacity development, stakeholder's engagement, supervision, and support are essential for a community-linked death review system. Policymakers and implementers should establish a functional relationship between community-linked reporting systems and the existing system as a starting point. There is a need for more studies to confirm or build on our pilot findings.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityMaternal MortalityWork EngagementCommunity Health WorkersData CollectionDeath CertificatesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPilot ProjectsPregnancyRural PopulationSouth AfricaStakeholder ParticipationStillbirthDeath reviewDeath surveillance and responseInfant mortalityNeonatal mortalitySocial autopsyStillbirthVerbal autopsy

Identifiers

PMID33243207
PMCPMC7690162
OpenAlexW3107768273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.