ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2021
Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Restorations Using the United States Public Health Service and Federation Dentaire Internationale Criteria: A 12-Month Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05180903 (Clinical Performance of Polyethylene Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Performance of Polyethylene Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations (Wall Papering Technique) Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth: A One Year Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The clinical performance of bulk-fill versus the incremental layered application of direct resin composite restorations: a systematic review.Evidence-based dentistry · 2023Pooled it
- Wear performance of different bulk-fill class II resin composite restorations: 3-year clinical evaluation.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Clinical performance of single shade universal resin composites: a randomized controlled one year follow-up study.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Comparative evaluation of bioactive alkasite-based material in different application modes: a 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial.Odontology · 2025Trial
- Evaluation of the roughness, color match, and color stability of two monochromatic composite resins: a randomized controlled laboratory study.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Clinical evaluation of SonicFill bulk resin technique in the restoration of proximal deep caries of primary molars: a two-year randomized controlled trial.BMC oral health · 2024Trial
- Randomized prospective clinical trial of class II restorations using flowable bulk-fill resin composites: 4-year follow-up.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Trial
- Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of posterior high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composite restorations in a high caries incidence population: interim results of a randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2021Trial
- Clinical Performance of Template-assisted Monochromatic Structural Colored Versus Universal Multishade Direct Composite Veneers Over 3 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Article
- Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Versus Incremental Composite Restorations in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review of In Vivo Evidence.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Clinical assessment of marginal and bulk fractures and discoloration in posterior composite after 12 to 36 months: A retrospective study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Article
- Clinical Performance of One-Piece Molar Endocrowns Fabricated from Different Ceramic Materials: A 36-Month Retrospective Clinical Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2025Article
- The influence of core-build up materials on biaxial flexural strength of strength-gradient zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics: an in-vitro study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Clinical performance and wear resistance of milled resin composite material versus direct nanohybrid bulk-fill resin composite in the restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth over 1 year: Randomized clinical trial.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Article
- Article
- A comparative study of the prognostic outcomes of periodontal soft tissue health in traditional restoration and micro-invasive restoration with the use of microscopy.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- The influence of core-build up materials on biaxial flexural strength of monolithic strength-gradient zirconia; an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Comparison between Different Bulk-Fill and Incremental Composite Materials Used for Class II Restorations in Primary and Permanent Teeth: In Vitro Assessments.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- [General anesthesia versus deep sedation for dental treatment in children: comparison of parental acceptance, oral health-related quality of life, and treatment efficacy].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2023Article
- Five-Year Clinical Performance of Complex Class II Resin Composite and Amalgam Restorations-A Retrospective Study.Dentistry journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was aimed to compare the 12-month clinical performance of two full-body bulk-fill resin composites Filtek bulk fill/3M ESPE (FBF) and Tetric EvoCeram bulk fill/Ivoclar Vivadent (TBF) and a conventional microhybrid resin composite Filtek Z250/3M ESPE (Z250) using the modified the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) and Federation Dentaire Internationale (FDI) criteria. Also, the agreement between the two evaluation criteria was evaluated at baseline and after 12 months of follow-up. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 138 class I and II restorations were placed in posterior teeth (split-mouth design) of 46 volunteers following manufacturer's instructions and bonded with a self-etching bonding agent (Clear fill SE Bond/Kuraray). The restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 12 months of follow-up by three previously calibrated dentists (Cohen's STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Fisher's exact test and Pearson's Chi-squared test were used to evaluating the homogeneity of distribution of the clinical characteristics. Friedman's test was applied to evaluate differences among the resin composites. The results obtained for the USPHS and FDI criteria at the different observation times were compared using the Wilcoxon test. A level of significance of 0.05 was adopted for all tests.
resultsAfter 12 months (recall rate, 78.3%,
conclusionThe bulk-fill resin composites showed satisfactory clinical performance compared with conventional resin composite after 12 months. The percentage of the acceptable scores was significantly higher for the USPHS criteria, due to discrepancies in the score description for each criterion.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.