Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33242389›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2021

Human Responses to Visually Evoked Threat.

Melis Yilmaz Balban, Erin Cafaro, Lauren Saue-Fletcher, Marlon J Washington, Maryam Bijanzadeh, A Moses Lee, Edward F Chang, Andrew D Huberman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Transition ability to safe states reduces fear responses to height.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Are Fear and Anxiety Truly Distinct?Biological psychiatry global open science · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melis Yilmaz BalbanDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Erin CafaroDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Lauren Saue-FletcherDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Marlon J WashingtonDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Maryam BijanzadehDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
A Moses LeeDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Edward F ChangDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Andrew D HubermanDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; BioX, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: adh1@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Functional organization of the superior temporal gyrus for speech perceptionR01DC012379 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Edward Chang · 2012 to 2026
$8.3M
Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
TRAINING THE NEXT GENERATION OF MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCHERSR25MH060482 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DANIEL H MATHALON, Susan M. Voglmaier · 2000 to 2026
$5.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012379NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH060482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision is the primary sense humans use to evaluate and respond to threats. Understanding the biological underpinnings of the human threat response has been hindered by lack of realistic in-lab threat paradigms. We established an immersive virtual reality (VR) platform to simultaneously measure behavior, physiological state, and neural activity from the human brain using chronically implanted electrodes. Subjects with high anxiety showed increased visual scanning in response to threats as compared to healthy controls. In both healthy and anxious subjects, the amount of scanning behavior correlated with the magnitude of physiological arousal, suggesting that visual scanning behavior is directly linked to internal state. Intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) recordings from three subjects suggested that high-frequency gamma activity in the insula positively correlates with physiological arousal induced by visual threats and that low-frequency theta activity in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) negatively correlates with physiological arousal induced by visual threats. These findings reveal a key role of eye movements and suggest that distinct insula and OFC activation dynamics may be important for detecting and adjusting human stress in response to visually perceived threats.

Indexed as

BrainAnxietyAnxiety DisordersEye MovementsHumansPrefrontal CortexVision, Ocularanxietyeye movementhuman fearinsulavirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID33242389
PMCPMC8407368
OpenAlexW3106565212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.