Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33242386›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021

COVID-19 vaccination intention in the UK: results from the COVID-19 vaccination acceptability study (CoVAccS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey.

Susan M Sherman, Louise E Smith, Julius Sim, Richard Amlôt, Megan Cutts, Hannah Dasch, G James Rubin, Nick Sevdalis

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04876885 (The Future of Viral Communications), which is not on this map. Cited by 426 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
426citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04876885 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Future of Viral Communications: Video-Based Health Promotion Strategies for COVID-19 Vaccinations

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled100ConditionsHealth Promotion, Health Education, COVID-19 VaccinesArmsEducational video
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

426 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

366 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Susan M ShermanSchool of Psychology, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6708-3398
Louise E SmithInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1277-2564
Julius SimSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1816-1676
Richard AmlôtNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, King's College London, London, UK.
Megan CuttsSchool of Psychology, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.
Hannah DaschInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
G James RubinInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4440-0570
Nick SevdalisInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7560-8924

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate factors associated with intention to be vaccinated against COVID-19 we conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1,500 UK adults, recruited from an existing online research panel. Data were collected between 14th and 17th July 2020. We used linear regression analyses to investigate associations between intention to be vaccinated for COVID-19 "when a vaccine becomes available to you" and sociodemographic factors, previous influenza vaccination, general vaccine attitudes and beliefs, attitudes and beliefs about COVID-19, and attitudes and beliefs about a COVID-19 vaccination. 64% of participants reported being very likely to be vaccinated against COVID-19, 27% were unsure, and 9% reported being very unlikely to be vaccinated. Personal and clinical characteristics, previous influenza vaccination, general vaccination beliefs, and beliefs and attitudes about COVID-19 and a COVID-19 vaccination explained 76% of the variance in vaccination intention. Intention to be vaccinated was associated with more positive general COVID-19 vaccination beliefs and attitudes, weaker beliefs that the vaccination would cause side effects or be unsafe, greater perceived information sufficiency to make an informed decision about COVID-19 vaccination, greater perceived risk of COVID-19 to others (but not risk to oneself), older age, and having been vaccinated for influenza last winter (2019/20). Despite uncertainty around the details of a COVID-19 vaccination, most participants reported intending to be vaccinated for COVID-19. Actual uptake may be lower. Vaccination intention reflects general vaccine beliefs and attitudes. Campaigns and messaging about a COVID-19 vaccination could consider emphasizing the risk of COVID-19 to others and necessity for everyone to be vaccinated.

Indexed as

IntentionAdultCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfluenza VaccinesSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesattitudesbarriersbeliefsCOVID-19Hesitancyvaccine

Identifiers

PMID33242386
PMCPMC8115754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.