Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33242131›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2021

Tumor suppression, dose-limiting toxicity and wellbeing with the fetal estrogen estetrol in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Marcus Schmidt, Hans Lenhard, Arnd Hoenig, Yvette Zimmerman, Jan Krijgh, Monique Jansen, Herjan J T Coelingh Bennink

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors: which one is the culprit of urinary incontinence in premenopausal breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant hormone therapy?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  7. Treating menopause - MHT and beyond.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  8. Estetrol: A New Choice for Contraception.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Estetrol and Mammary Gland: Friends or Foes?Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcus SchmidtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55122, Mainz, Germany.
Hans LenhardDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Katholisches Klinikum Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Arnd HoenigDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Katholisches Klinikum Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Yvette ZimmermanPantarhei Oncology BV, Boulevard 17, 3707 BK, Zeist, The Netherlands.
Jan KrijghPantarhei Oncology BV, Boulevard 17, 3707 BK, Zeist, The Netherlands.
Monique JansenPantarhei Oncology BV, Boulevard 17, 3707 BK, Zeist, The Netherlands.
Herjan J T Coelingh BenninkPantarhei Oncology BV, Boulevard 17, 3707 BK, Zeist, The Netherlands. hcb@pantarheibio.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1550-9400
Pantarhei Bioscience (Netherlands) · NLUniversity of Applied Sciences Mainz · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study (the ABCE4 study) was to assess dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of high doses of the fetal estrogen estetrol (E4) in postmenopausal patients with heavily pretreated, locally advanced and/or metastatic ER+/HER2-breast cancer, resistant to anti-estrogens.

methodsThis was a multicenter, open-label, phase IB/IIA, dose-escalation study with a 3 + 3 cohort design, whereby successive cohorts of three patients received 20 mg, 40 mg or 60 mg E4 per day for 12 weeks by oral administration. DLTs, safety and wellbeing were evaluated after 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment. Anti-tumor effects were investigated by computer tomography scanning and evaluated according to RECIST criteria before and after 12 weeks of treatment. Wellbeing was judged weekly by the investigator and by quality-of-life questionnaires by the patients. In view of the small number of patients, no statistical testing was performed.

resultsAll 12 patients enrolled had progressive, heavily pre-treated advanced breast cancer. No treatment-related serious adverse events or DLTs occurred during the first 4 weeks of E4 treatment allowing the investigation of all three doses. Five of nine patients completing 12 weeks of E4 treatment showed objective anti-tumor effects and six of nine patients reported improved wellbeing.

conclusionHigh doses of estetrol seem to be safe and are well tolerated during 12 weeks of treatment without dose-limiting toxicity and with anti-tumor effects in five of nine heavily treated patients with progressive, anti-estrogen resistant, advanced breast cancer.

Indexed as

AgedBreast NeoplasmsCell ProliferationDisease ProgressionDose-Response Relationship, DrugEstetrolFemaleHumansMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisTreatment OutcomeTumor BurdenEstetrolAdvanced breast cancerEstetrol (E4)High-dose estrogen (HDE) treatment

Identifiers

PMID33242131
PMCPMC8076125
OpenAlexW3107112086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.