ArticleNeurosurgical review2021
Intraoperative local hemodynamic quantitative analysis of direct revascularization in patients with moyamoya disease.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Individualised evaluation based on pathophysiology for moyamoya vasculopathy: application in surgical revascularisation.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct bypass surgery improves blood flow in patients with moyamoya disease (MMD) as well as causes local flow relocation and disturbance. This study aimed to describe the characteristics and changes of quantitative blood flow in MMD patients. Sixty-four consecutive MMD patients (67 hemispheres) who underwent STA-MCA anastomosis between August 2013 and September 2017 were included in this study. Intraoperative blood flow of superficial temporal artery and middle cerebral artery was measured with a noninvasive, ultrasound flowprobe, before and after the bypass. All data were collected prospectively. Before the bypass, 67 hemispheres were measured and 45 hemispheres acquired post-bypass measurements. Thirty-three (49.3%) had anterograde flow and 34 (50.7%) had retrograde. Retrograde blood flow was significantly higher than anterograde blood flow in MCA-M4 section (3.71 ± 2.78 ml/min vs 2.39 ± 1.71 ml/min, P = 0.023). Thirty-eight (56.7%) patients had local cerebrovascular reactivity, whereas 29 (43.3%) lost it. After bypass, blood flow was changed into three patterns: anterograde flow (1, 2.2%), retrograde flow (3, 6.7%), and bi-direction flow (41, 91.1%). Flow of M4 was significantly improved in both proximal (13.64 ± 9.16 vs 3.28 ± 2.57, P < 0.001) and distal (7.17 ± 7.21 vs 3.28 ± 2.57, P = 0.002) sides to the bypass. Postoperative infarctions occurred in 4 (8.9%) patients. All postoperative infarctions (n = 4) happened in those patients who did not have change of flow direction in M4 section distal to the bypass (P = 0.040). Direct bypass surgery improves local blood flow after bypass surgery in both sides of the anastomosis. Flow direction was usually changed after the surgery into a bi-direction pattern: anterograde flow in M4 distal to the bypass, and retrograde flow in M4 proximal to the bypass. Proximal side acquired around 5.4 times of flow than the distal side. Patients with change of flow direction in distal M4 were related with lower risks of postoperative infarctions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.