Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33242121›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2021

[Potentials and limits of aging cohort studies for geriatric psychiatry].

M A Rapp, M Tschorn, T Supprian, C Thomas, S Kreisel, J Benninghoff, G Schumann, A Heinz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M A RappSozial- und Präventivmedizin, Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften, Universität Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, 14469, Potsdam, Deutschland. michael.rapp@uni-potsdam.de.
M TschornSozial- und Präventivmedizin, Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Strukturbereich Kognitionswissenschaften, Universität Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, 14469, Potsdam, Deutschland.
T SupprianAbteilung Gerontopsychiatrie, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Kliniken der Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
C ThomasKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie für Ältere, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Deutschland.
S KreiselAbteilung Gerontopsychiatrie, Campus Bielefeld-Bethel, Universitätsklinikum Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Bielefeld, Deutschland.
J BenninghoffZentrum für Altersmedizin und Entwicklungsstörungen, kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost, Haar, Deutschland.
G SchumannKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, PONS Zentrum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
A HeinzKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, PONS Zentrum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sizeable number of population-based cohort studies of aging in Germany have provided highly valuable contributions for the specification of risk factors and predictors for frequent mental disorders in old age, especially dementia and depression. The results from these cohort studies enable the specification of mechanisms for the development of and preventative interventions for common mental disorders in old age. On the other hand, there is a significant paucity of clinical cohort studies investigating disease trajectories and possible markers for specific individualized interventions of frequent mental disorders in old age. In this article, we report selected key findings from cohort studies of aging and discuss novel approaches for the integration and harmonization of population-based and clinical cohort studies.

Indexed as

Geriatric PsychiatryMental DisordersAgedAgingCohort StudiesGermanyHumansAgingDisease courseMental diseasesPanel studiesRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID33242121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.