ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2021
[Molecular subtypes of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder-background and clinical relevance].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Molecular diagnostics of bladder cancer-practical ramifications].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced and metastatic stages of bladder cancer are associated with a poor prognosis. Therapy options are currently limited to systemic therapy with chemo- and immunotherapeutics. In order to improve individual therapy and especially to achieve a more favorable prognosis for these patients, intrinsic molecular subtypes have recently been identified in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. This review article presents the latest developments, background, and clinical relevance of molecular subtypes in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. The existing literature and current study data were analyzed to present and evaluate the different molecular classification systems. A focus was placed on the possible therapeutic implications of these molecular subtypes. Although promising progress has been made in the molecular subtyping of urothelial carcinoma, this classification has not yet found its way into clinical application. Multicenter prospective studies with standardized study protocols are still lacking. Previous studies differ in molecular markers, sample collection and preparation procedures, and analytical protocols. Standardization is urgently needed before guidelines can be established and targeted treatment regimens implemented. In principle, the aim should be to develop a stable and as simple as possible methodology, enabling personalized treatment based on molecular subtypes to be broadly applied, and not just in specialized expert centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.