Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33242119›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2021

[Molecular subtypes of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder-background and clinical relevance].

Philipp Erben, Christoph Becker, Igor Tsaur, Matthias B Stope, Tilman Todenhöfer, Fachgruppe Molekulare Urologie der Arbeitsgruppe urologische Forschung (AuF) der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Philipp ErbenKlinik für Urologie und Urochirurgie, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Christoph BeckerFachgruppe Molekulare Urologie der Arbeitsgruppe urologische Forschung (AuF) der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Deutschland. cbecker@dgu.de.
Igor TsaurFachgruppe Molekulare Urologie der Arbeitsgruppe urologische Forschung (AuF) der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Matthias B StopeFachgruppe Molekulare Urologie der Arbeitsgruppe urologische Forschung (AuF) der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Tilman TodenhöferFachgruppe Molekulare Urologie der Arbeitsgruppe urologische Forschung (AuF) der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Fachgruppe Molekulare Urologie der Arbeitsgruppe urologische Forschung (AuF) der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie · DEHeidelberg University · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced and metastatic stages of bladder cancer are associated with a poor prognosis. Therapy options are currently limited to systemic therapy with chemo- and immunotherapeutics. In order to improve individual therapy and especially to achieve a more favorable prognosis for these patients, intrinsic molecular subtypes have recently been identified in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. This review article presents the latest developments, background, and clinical relevance of molecular subtypes in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. The existing literature and current study data were analyzed to present and evaluate the different molecular classification systems. A focus was placed on the possible therapeutic implications of these molecular subtypes. Although promising progress has been made in the molecular subtyping of urothelial carcinoma, this classification has not yet found its way into clinical application. Multicenter prospective studies with standardized study protocols are still lacking. Previous studies differ in molecular markers, sample collection and preparation procedures, and analytical protocols. Standardization is urgently needed before guidelines can be established and targeted treatment regimens implemented. In principle, the aim should be to develop a stable and as simple as possible methodology, enabling personalized treatment based on molecular subtypes to be broadly applied, and not just in specialized expert centers.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisProspective StudiesBladder cancerGenomicsIndividualized treatmentLiquid biopsyMolecular subtypesTherapeutic implicationsUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID33242119
OpenAlexW3107565762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.