Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33241999›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Tracking prototype and exemplar representations in the brain across learning.

Caitlin R Bowman, Takako Iwashita, Dagmar Zeithamova

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05910762 (Learning Novel Structure Across Time and Sleep), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05910762 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Learning Novel Structure Across Time and Sleep

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2023 to 2026Enrolled119ConditionsLearning, Humans, Consolidation, SleepArmsAssociative inference, Category learning, Sleep
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Distinct Hippocampal Mechanisms Support Concept Formation and Updating.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. High coherence among training exemplars promotes broad generalization of face families.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Emergence of Categorical Representations in Parietal and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex across Extended Training.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caitlin R BowmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5833-3591
Takako IwashitaDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Dagmar ZeithamovaDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
University of Oregon · US

Funding

Neural mechanisms of specificity and generalization learningR01NS112366 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI ZEITHAMOVA, DAGMAR · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
Memory precision and generalization: aging effects on the cognitive and neural basis of adaptive memory functionF32AG054204 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI BOWMAN, CAITLIN R. · 2017 to 2019
$179k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG054204NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS112366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a long-standing debate about whether categories are represented by individual category members (exemplars) or by the central tendency abstracted from individual members (prototypes). Neuroimaging studies have shown neural evidence for either exemplar representations or prototype representations, but not both. Presently, we asked whether it is possible for multiple types of category representations to exist within a single task. We designed a categorization task to promote both exemplar and prototype representations and tracked their formation across learning. We found only prototype correlates during the final test. However, interim tests interspersed throughout learning showed prototype and exemplar representations across distinct brain regions that aligned with previous studies: prototypes in ventromedial prefrontal cortex and anterior hippocampus and exemplars in inferior frontal gyrus and lateral parietal cortex. These findings indicate that, under the right circumstances, individuals may form representations at multiple levels of specificity, potentially facilitating a broad range of future decisions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrainFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHippocampusHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParietal LobePrefrontal CortexYoung Adultcategory learningfmrigeneralizationhippocampushumanlong term memoryneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID33241999
PMCPMC7746231
OpenAlexW3109774105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.