Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33241996›Full record

Observational studyeLife2020

A novel haemocytometric COVID-19 prognostic score developed and validated in an observational multicentre European hospital-based study.

Joachim Linssen, Anthony Ermens, Marvin Berrevoets, Michela Seghezzi, Giulia Previtali, Simone van der Sar-van der Brugge, Henk Russcher, Annelies Verbon, Judith Gillis, Jürgen Riedl and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Joachim LinssenSysmex Europe GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Anthony ErmensAmphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands.
Marvin BerrevoetsElisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Michela SeghezziHospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Giulia PrevitaliHospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Simone van der Sar-van der BruggeAmphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6462-075X
Henk RusscherErasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Annelies VerbonErasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Judith GillisLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Jürgen RiedlAlbert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Eva de JonghAlbert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Jarob SakerSysmex Europe GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Marion MünsterSysmex Europe GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Imke Ca MunnixCanisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Anthonius DofferhofCanisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Volkher ScharnhorstCatharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Heidi AmmerlaanCatharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Kathleen DeiterenUniversity Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Stephan Jl BakkerUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Lucas Joost Van PeltUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5538-1806
Yvette Kluiters-de HinghElisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Mathie Pg LeersZuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands.
Andre J van der VenRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1833-3391

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 induces haemocytometric changes. Complete blood count changes, including new cell activation parameters, from 982 confirmed COVID-19 adult patients from 11 European hospitals were retrospectively analysed for distinctive patterns based on age, gender, clinical severity, symptom duration, and hospital days. The observed haemocytometric patterns formed the basis to develop a multi-haemocytometric-parameter prognostic score to predict, during the first three days after presentation, which patients will recover without ventilation or deteriorate within a two-week timeframe, needing intensive care or with fatal outcome. The prognostic score, with ROC curve AUC at baseline of 0.753 (95% CI 0.723-0.781) increasing to 0.875 (95% CI 0.806-0.926) on day 3, was superior to any individual parameter at distinguishing between clinical severity. Findings were confirmed in a validation cohort. Aim is that the score and haemocytometry results are simultaneously provided by analyser software, enabling wide applicability of the score as haemocytometry is commonly requested in COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

HospitalsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Cell CountCohort StudiesCOVID-19EuropeFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPrognosiscomplete blood countCOVID-19haemocytometryhumanintensive caremedicineprognostic score

Identifiers

PMID33241996
PMCPMC7732342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.