Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33241555›Full record

ArticleJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2021

An International Survey of Clinicians' Experience Caring for Patients Receiving Home Parenteral Nutrition for Chronic Intestinal Failure During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Philip J Allan, Loris Pironi, Francisca Joly, Simon Lal, André Van Gossum, Home Artificial Nutrition & Chronic Intestinal Failure special interest group of ESPEN

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. COVID-19 infection in patients with intestinal failure: UK experience.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Philip J AllanTranslational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Headley Way, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2682-772X
Loris PironiCenter for Chronic Intestinal Failure - Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1773-8330
Francisca JolyCentre for Intestinal Failure, Department of Gastroenterology and Nutritional Support, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France.
Simon LalIntestinal Failure Unit, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Salford, UK.
André Van GossumMedico-Surgical Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.
Home Artificial Nutrition & Chronic Intestinal Failure special interest group of ESPEN
Azienda USL di Bologna · ITErasmus Hospital · BEHôpital Beaujon · FRManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis survey of centers caring for patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) was conducted to assess the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis on the management of these patients regarding provision of care, monitoring, regular follow-up, and any changes to service infrastructure.

methodsA survey was devised and publically published on the Research Electronic Data Capture database management system, with individual centers responding to a public link.

resultsA total of 78 adult and pediatric centers worldwide contributed to the survey, representing ≥3500 patients' experiences. Centers reported infrastructure maintenance for Parenteral Nutrition (PN) bag deliveries to patients (60, 76.92%) or delivery of ancillary items (57, 73.08%), home delivery and HPN administration (65, 83.33%), and home care nurse shortages (25, 32.05%). Routine follow-up of HPN patients changed to either all telemed or mixed with emergency clinic review (70, 89.74%). In 26 centers (33.33%), HPN for newly discharged patients with benign conditions was reduced or stopped. Based on clinical history, the centers reported psychological distress for patients (52, 66.67%), with anxiety, worry, concern, and apprehension reported most frequently (37 of 52, 71.15%) but also fear (10 of 52, 19.23%), depression (5 of 52, 9.62%), and issues related to isolation/confinement (12 of 52, 23.08%).

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic was reported by clinicians to have had a far-reaching adverse impact on patients receiving HPN, especially their safety in terms of provision of personal protective equipment, PN bags, available nursing staff, and psychological well-being. Healthcare systems responded to the challenge and presented new ways of working.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansIntestinal DiseasesPandemicsParenteral Nutrition, HomePatient CarePhysiciansSARS-CoV-2chronic intestinal failurecoronavirus disease 2019home parenteral nutritionparenteral nutrition

Identifiers

PMID33241555
PMCPMC7753815
OpenAlexW3110024747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.