Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33241511›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Conventional MRI-based subchondral trabecular biomarkers as predictors of knee osteoarthritis progression: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Farhad Pishgar, Ali Guermazi, Frank W Roemer, Thomas M Link, Shadpour Demehri

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Osteoarthritis year in review 2022: imaging.Osteoarthritis and cartilage · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Farhad PishgarRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, JHOC, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. Pishgar@JHMI.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0703-8442
Ali GuermaziDepartment of Radiology, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Frank W RoemerDepartment of Radiology, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Thomas M LinkDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Shadpour DemehriRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, JHOC, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Boston University · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Skeleton and Joint Degeneration with AgingP01AG066603 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WAN, MEI · 2021 to 2025
$9.2M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG066603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the reliability and validity of measuring subchondral trabecular biomarkers in "conventional" intermediate-weighted (IW) MRI sequences and to assess the predictive value of biomarker changes for predicting near-term symptomatic and structural progressions in knee osteoarthritis (OA).

methodsFor this study, a framework for measuring trabecular biomarkers in the proximal medial tibia in the "conventional" IW MRI sequence was developed. The reliability of measuring these biomarkers (trabecular thickness [cTbTh], spacing [cTbSp], connectivity density [cConnD], and bone-to-total volume ratio [cBV/TV]) was evaluated in the Bone Ancillary Study (within the Osteoarthritis Initiative [OAI]). The validity of these measurements was assessed by comparing to "apparent" biomarkers (from high-resolution steady-state MRI sequence) and peri-articular bone marrow density (BMD, from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry). The association of these biomarker changes from baseline to 24 months (using the Reliable Change Index) with knee OA progression was studied in the FNIH OA Biomarkers Consortium (within the OAI). Pain and radiographic progression were evaluated by comparing baseline WOMAC pain score and radiographic joint space width with the 24-to-48-month scores/measurements. Associations between biomarker changes and these outcomes were studied using logistic regression adjusted for the relevant covariates.

resultsWith acceptable reliability, the cTbTh and cBV/TV, but not cTbSp or cConnD, were modestly associated with the "apparent" biomarkers and peri-articular BMD (β: 1.10 [95% CI: 0.45-1.75], p value: 0.001 and β: 3.69 [95% CI: 2.56-4.83], p value: < 0.001, respectively). Knees with increased cTbTh had higher (OR: 1.44 [95% CI: 1.03-2.02], p value: 0.035) and knees with decreased cTbTh (OR: 0.69 [95% CI: 0.49-0.95], p value: 0.026) or decreased cBV/TV (OR: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.48-0.93], p value: 0.018) had lower odds of experiencing OA pain progression over the follow-ups.

conclusionsMeasurement of certain "conventional" MRI-based subchondral trabecular biomarkers has high reliability and modest validity. Though modest, there are significant associations between these biomarker changes and knee OA pain progression up to 48-month follow-up. KEY POINTS: • Despite the lower spatial resolution than what is required to accurately study the subchondral trabecular microstructures, the "conventional" IW MRI sequences may retain adequate information that allows quantification of trabecular microstructure biomarkers. • Subchondral trabecular biomarkers obtained from "conventional" IW MRI sequences (i.e., cTbTh, cTbSp, and cBV/TV) are reliable and valid measures of trabecular microstructure changes compared to those from "apparent" trabecular biomarkers (from the FISP MRI sequence) and peri-articular BMD (from DXA). • Increased trabecular thickness and bone-to-total ratio (cTbTh and cBV/TV, obtained from "conventional" IW MRI sequences) from baseline to 24-month visits may be associated with higher odds of knee OA pain progression over 48 months of follow-up.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularOsteoarthritis, KneeBiomarkersDisease ProgressionHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsTibiaBiomarkersBiomarkersKnee jointMagnetic resonance imagingOsteoarthritis, knee

Identifiers

PMID33241511
PMCPMC9583892
OpenAlexW3107771128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.