Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33241456›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021

Sequential implementation of DSC-MR perfusion and dynamic [

Eike Steidl, Karl-Josef Langen, Sarah Abu Hmeidan, Nenad Polomac, Christian P Filss, Norbert Galldiks, Philipp Lohmann, Fee Keil, Katharina Filipski, Felix M Mottaghy and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. DEGRO practical guideline for central nervous system radiation necrosis part 1: classification and a multistep approach for diagnosis.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Guideline
  4. The confounding effects of microvascular physiology on the uptake and diagnostic accuracy of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Resolving spatial response heterogeneity in glioblastoma.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  12. Contribution of [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. A comparison study of dynamic [Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Assessment of Brain Tumour Perfusion Using Early-PhaseMolecular imaging and biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [BMJ open · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Eike SteidlInstitute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Schleusenweg 2-16, Frankfurt am Main, 60528, Germany. eike.steidl@kgu.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7464-0236
Karl-Josef LangenInst. of Neuroscience and Medicine, Medical Imaging Physics (INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Sarah Abu HmeidanInstitute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Schleusenweg 2-16, Frankfurt am Main, 60528, Germany.
Nenad PolomacInstitute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Schleusenweg 2-16, Frankfurt am Main, 60528, Germany.
Christian P FilssInst. of Neuroscience and Medicine, Medical Imaging Physics (INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Norbert GalldiksInst. of Neuroscience and Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Philipp LohmannInst. of Neuroscience and Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Fee KeilInstitute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Schleusenweg 2-16, Frankfurt am Main, 60528, Germany.
Katharina FilipskiUniversity Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Felix M MottaghyDept. of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Nadim Jon ShahInst. of Neuroscience and Medicine, Medical Imaging Physics (INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Joachim P SteinbachUniversity Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Elke HattingenInstitute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Schleusenweg 2-16, Frankfurt am Main, 60528, Germany.
Gabriele D MaurerUniversity Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEForschungszentrum Jülich · DEMaastricht University · NL

Funding

Dr. Senckenberg foundation 2014/SIN-02Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung Clinican-Scientist Stipend
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePerfusion-weighted MRI (PWI) and O-(2-[

methodsWe evaluated 104 patients with WHO grade II-IV glioma and suspected TP on conventional MRI using PWI and dynamic [

resultsAcross all patients, the differentiation of TP from TRC using rCBV

conclusionWhile marked hyperperfusion on PWI indicated TP, [

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPerfusionPositron-Emission TomographyRetrospective StudiesTyrosineTyrosine[18F]FET PETGliomaIsocitrate dehydrogenasePseudoprogressionPWI

Identifiers

PMID33241456
PMCPMC8113145
OpenAlexW3107021579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.