Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33241429›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2021

Video-based self-assessment enhances laparoscopic skills on a virtual reality simulator: a randomized controlled trial.

Antoine Netter, Andy Schmitt, Aubert Agostini, Patrice Crochet

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the use of metacognitive monitoring cues following a diagram completion intervention.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Antoine NetterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital de la Conception, Aix Marseille University, 147 Boulevard Baille, 13005, Marseille, France.
Andy SchmittDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier du Pays D'Aix, Aix-en-provence, France.
Aubert AgostiniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital de la Conception, Aix Marseille University, 147 Boulevard Baille, 13005, Marseille, France.
Patrice CrochetDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital de la Conception, Aix Marseille University, 147 Boulevard Baille, 13005, Marseille, France. pcrochet.marseille@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7618-653X
Aix-Marseille Université · FRCentre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHysterectomy rates are decreasing in many countries, and virtual reality (VR) simulators bring new training opportunities for residents. As coaching interventions while training on a simulated complex procedure represents a resource challenge, alternative strategies to improve surgical skills must be investigated. We sought to determine whether self-guided learning using a video-based self-assessment (SA) leads to improved surgical skills in laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) on a VR simulator.

methodsTwenty-four gynecology residents from two university hospitals were randomized into an SA group (n = 12) and a Control group (n = 12). Each participant's baseline performance on a validated VR basic task was assessed. Both groups then performed three virtually simulated LHs during which the participants received no guidance nor feedback. Following each LH, the SA group participants rated the video of their own performance using a generic and a procedure-specific rating scale, while the Control group participants watched an LH video demonstration. The LH videos of both groups' participants were blindly reviewed and rated by expert surgeons, using modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills scores (OSATS). Objective metrics recorded by the VR simulator were also compared.

resultsThere was no difference between the groups' baseline performances on the VR basic task. For the first LH, the OSATS-derived scores did not differ between SA and Control groups (9 [7-13] versus 9 [8-14]; p = 0.728). For the third LH, the OSATS-derived scores were higher for the SA group than for the Control group (17 [15-21] versus 15 [11-17], p = 0.039). Between the two groups, the objective metrics did not differ from the first to the third LH.

conclusionsThe use of a structured video-based SA leads to improved procedural skills in LH on a VR simulator compared to watching benchmark expert performance, in a population of residents with moderate experience in the operating room.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyLaparoscopyVirtual RealityClinical CompetenceComputer SimulationFemaleHumansHysterectomySelf-AssessmentUser-Computer InterfaceLaparoscopic hysterectomyResidencySelf-assessmentSelf-guided learningSimulationSurgeryTraining

Identifiers

PMID33241429
OpenAlexW3108379157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.