Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33241428›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

An MRI-based multi-objective radiomics model predicts lymph node status in patients with rectal cancer.

Jin Li, Yang Zhou, Xinxin Wang, Meijuan Zhou, Xi Chen, Kuan Luan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jin LiAutomation College, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6033-0381
Yang ZhouAutomation College, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5296-220X
Xinxin WangDepartment of Radiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9989-921X
Meijuan ZhouSchool of Information and Communications Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0634-0060
Xi ChenSchool of Information and Communications Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6321-2279
Kuan LuanAutomation College, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, China. luankuan@hrbeu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-6739-0072

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo apply a multi-objective radiomics model based on pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for improving diagnostic accuracy of LN metastasis in rectal cancer patients.

methodsThis study consisted of 91 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer from April 2018 to March 2019. All patients underwent rectal MRI before surgery without any other treatment. Clinical data, subjective radiologist assessments, and radiomic features of LNs were obtained. A total of 1409 radiomic features were extracted from T2WI LN images. Multi-objective optimization with the iterative multi-objective immune algorithm (IMIA) was used to select radiomic features to build prediction models. Predictive performances of radiomic, radiologist, and combined radiomic and radiologist models were assessed for accuracy by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves.

resultsFor the radiologist analysis, heterogeneity was the only significant independent predictor of LN status. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the subjective radiologist analysis were 72.09%, 73.81%, and 78.12%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the solitary radiomic model consisting of 10 features were 89.81%, 82.57%, and 87.77%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the combined model, which consisted of 12 radiomic and radiologist features, were 92.23%, 84.69%, and 89.88%, respectively. The combined model had the best prediction performance with an AUC of 0.94.

conclusionsThe multi-objective radiomics model based on T2WI images was very useful in predicting pre-operative LN status in rectal cancer patients.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesLymph nodesMagnetic resonance imagingMulti-objective radiomicsRectal cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.