Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33241221›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2020

The use of biologics in professional and Olympic sport: a scoping review protocol.

Navnit S Makaram, Iain R Murray, Scott A Rodeo, Seth L Sherman, Andrew D Murray, Fares S Haddad, Timothy R McAdams, Geoffrey D Abrams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Injection therapy in professional footballers.International orthopaedics · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A solid and strong beginning.Bone & joint open · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Navnit S MakaramThe University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Iain R MurrayThe University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Scott A RodeoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Seth L ShermanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, USA.
Andrew D MurrayCentre for Sport and Exercise, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Fares S HaddadDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University College London, London, UK.
Timothy R McAdamsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, USA.
Geoffrey D AbramsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe use of biologics in the treatment of musculoskeletal injuries in Olympic and professional athletes appears to be increasing. There are no studies which currently map the extent, range, and nature of existing literature concerning the use and efficacy of such therapies in this arena. The objective of this scoping review is to map the available evidence regarding the use of biologics in the treatment of musculoskeletal injuries in Olympic and professional sport.

methodsBest-practice methodological frameworks suggested by Arksey and O'Malley, Levac et al, and the Joanna Briggs Institute will be used. This scoping review will aim to firstly map the current extent, range, and nature of evidence for biologic strategies to treat injuries in professional and Olympic sport; secondly, to summarize and disseminate existing research findings; and thirdly, to identify gaps in existing literature. A three-step search strategy will identify peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed literature, including reviews, original research, and both published and unpublished ('grey') literature. An initial limited search will identify suitable search terms, followed by a search of five electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) using keyword and index terms. Studies will be screened independently by two reviewers for final inclusion. DISSEMINATION: We will chart key concepts and evidence, and disseminate existing research findings to practitioners and clinicians, through both peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed literature, online platforms (including social media), conference, and in-person communications. We will identify gaps in current literature and priorities for further study.

Indexed as

AthleteBiologicsBMACBone marrow aspirate concentrateMesenchymal stem cellMesenchymal stromal cellOrthobiologicsPlatelet-rich plasmaPRPSport

Identifiers

PMID33241221
PMCPMC7684394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.