Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33241180›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2020

Internet-Based Patient Education Prior to Colonoscopy: Prospective, Observational Study of a Single Center's Implementation, with Objective Assessment of Bowel Preparation Quality and Patient Satisfaction.

Roberto Trasolini, Estello Nap-Hill, Matthew Suzuki, Cherry Galorport, Jordan Yonge, Jack Amar, Brian Bressler, Hin Hin Ko, Eric C S Lam, Alnoor Ramji and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Roberto TrasoliniDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.ORCID 0000-0001-8059-9807
Estello Nap-HillDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.ORCID 0000-0002-2272-5649
Matthew SuzukiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Cherry GalorportDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Jordan YongeDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Jack AmarDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Brian BresslerDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Hin Hin KoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Eric C S LamDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Alnoor RamjiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Gregory RosenfeldDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Jennifer J TelfordDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Scott WhittakerDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Robert A EnnsDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonpharmacologic factors, including patient education, affect bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Optimal cleansing increases quality and reduces repeat procedures. This study prospectively analyzes use of an individualized online patient education module in place of traditional patient education.

aimsTo determine the effectiveness of online education for patients, measured by the proportion achieving sufficient bowel preparation. Secondary measures include assessment of patient satisfaction.

methodsProspective, single-center, observational study. Adults aged 19 years and over, with an e-mail account, scheduled for nonurgent colonoscopy, with English proficiency (or someone who could translate for them) were recruited. Demographics and objective bowel preparation quality were collected. Patient satisfaction was assessed via survey to assess clarity and usefulness of the module.

resultsNine hundred consecutive patients completed the study. 84.6% of patients achieved adequate bowel preparation as measured by Boston bowel preparation score ≥ 6 and 90.1% scored adequately using Ottawa bowel preparation score ≤7. 94.2% and 92.1% of patients rated the web-education module as 'very useful' and 'very clear', respectively (≥8/10 on respective scales).

conclusionsOur analysis suggests that internet-based patient education prior to colonoscopy is a viable option and achieves adequate bowel preparation. Preparation quality is comparable to previously published trials. Included patients found the process clear and useful. Pragmatic benefits of a web-based protocol such as time and cost savings were not formally assessed but may contribute to greater satisfaction for endoscopists and patients.

Identifiers

PMID33241180
PMCPMC7678736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.