ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2020
Patient Experiences with Colonoscopy: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy. Application of artificial intelligence algorithms to identify complete colonic investigations.United European gastroenterology journal · 2020Trial
- Exploring endoscopy sedation experiences in young adults with pediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease after transfer to adult gastroenterology care.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Article
- Effect of music therapy on patient experience in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a scoping review.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Experience of NHS diagnostic investigation following a multi-cancer early detection (MCED) screening test: qualitative interviews with NHS-Galleri trial participants who had a cancer signal detected.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- "It's a tool, it's got hardships": a qualitative study of patient experience of colonoscopy and implications for trauma-informed care.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Patient perspectives on health care models in cardiac surgery: a qualitative evaluation.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Development and content validity testing of a colonoscopy-specific patient-reported experience measure: the Patient Experience Colonoscopy Scale (PECS).Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- Participants' experiences of the management of screen-detected complex polyps within a structured bowel cancer screening programme.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Patient-Reported Experience Measures for Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- New Patient Education Video on Colonoscopy Preparation: Development and Evaluation Study.JMIR human factors · 2020Article
- Patient-centered approaches to targeting incomplete bowel preparations for inpatient colonoscopies.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient perspectives have important roles in improving the quality of colonoscopy services. The purpose of this qualitative study was to obtain the perspectives of patients who recently had undergone colonoscopy procedures, about their experiences with bowel preparation, the procedure itself, and communication of follow-up results and recommendations.
methodsWe recruited adults who had undergone a colonoscopy, to participate in semistructured interviews. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analyzed using inductive qualitative methods.
resultsTwenty-four adults (58% female) with an average age of 53.8 years participated. Results were categorized within the themes of bowel preparation, the colonoscopy procedure and communication of the results. Participants appreciated having clear consistent plain language messages about bowel preparation. Some participants experienced additional challenges to understanding, and navigating, colonoscopy procedures. At the time of the procedure, positive and reassuring interactions with, and between, members of the health care team, in addition to management of physical pain and discomfort, were important. Participants wanted clear and timely information about the results of their test.
conclusionsUnderstanding patients' needs for information and support can promote higher quality colonoscopy services. Our findings suggest that quality indicators should include: patients' perspectives of the clarity of bowel instructions; the need for supports that are not routinely provided; the extent to which concerns about the procedure are addressed; interactions with the endoscopy team; the endoscopy team's interactions with each other; comfort during the procedure, and the timeliness and clarity of results and follow-up instructions. These indicators should be included in annual patient surveys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.