ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2020
How can vulnerable groups be recruited to participate in a community-based smoking cessation program and perceptions of effective elements: A qualitative study among participants and professionals.
Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tailoring a national smoking cessation support programme in co-creation with (expectant) parents in vulnerable situations.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Infrastructure of tobacco and nicotine cessation services in Finnish healthcare: A cross-sectional study.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
- Exploring the social context of smoking behaviours: insights from stop-smoking advisors in deprived communities in Northwest of England UK.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Barriers to smoking interventions in community healthcare settings: a scoping review.Health promotion international · 2024Article
- Challenges and successes in the sustainment of Dutch community-level smoking cessation interventions for residents with a low socioeconomic position.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Reducing the number and types of tobacco retail outlets in the Netherlands: Study protocol for a comprehensive mixedmethods policy evaluation.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2023Article
- Outdoor smoking as a nuisance to non-smokers: The case for smoke-free outdoor public spaces in dense urban areas.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2022Article
- "At least someone thinks I'm doing well": a real-world evaluation of the quit-smoking app StopCoach for lower socio-economic status smokers.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2021Article
- Factors affecting smoking initiation and cessation among adult smokers in Fiji: A qualitative study.Tobacco induced diseases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSmokers from vulnerable groups, such as smokers with a low socioeconomic position, often have more difficulty quitting smoking and often are more difficult to recruit for smoking cessation programs. It is important to know how vulnerable groups can be recruited and motivated to participate in a smoking cessation program and what participants and professionals perceive as effective elements.
methodsQualitative interviews were performed with participants of a communitybased smoking cessation program in the Netherlands (n=18) and professionals involved in the recruitment of participants or as trainers in the community-based smoking cessation program (n=8). They were interviewed twice: once before the program had started and once after the program had ended. Interviews were semi-structured and conducted between September 2018 and February 2019.
resultsWe found that organizing the program in the neighborhood lowered the threshold to participate, that registration should be quick and easy, that an active approach is needed, and that personal contact is important. This study also showed that information sharing, social support, commitment of the trainer, and personal contact are perceived as effective elements of such a program.
conclusionsThis study shows that vulnerable smokers can be successfully recruited for a smoking cessation program. We recommend that such interventions include a group setting, extensive personal contact between participants and a committed trainer, and implementation of the program at a location in the neighborhood of the target group. Practical recommendations for professionals are to personally approach people multiple times if needed, to make sure that registration is quick and easy, and to fill in the registration form immediately during recruitment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.