Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33241159›Full record

ArticleThe South African journal of physiotherapy2020

Pectoralis minor length measurements in three different scapula positions.

Muhle A Komati, Francina E Korkie, Piet Becker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The South African journal of physiotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muhle A KomatiDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1425-2922
Francina E KorkieDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0302-0491
Piet BeckerDepartment of Biostatistics, Research Office, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9384-6472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pectoralis minor (PM) muscle is commonly regarded as a contributor to abnormal scapula positioning. Subsequently, the muscle length of the scapular stabilising muscles may be affected, as these muscles assume a lengthened position, which over time causes weakness. There are inconsistencies regarding PM muscle length values because of the different techniques and positions used when the length of the PM muscle is measured.

objectiveTo determine the PM muscle length in participants aged 18-24 using a Vernier

methodThe PM muscle length of 144 participants was measured with a Vernier

resultsSignificant differences were observed in PMI between the resting scapula position - 10.04 (confidence interval, CI 9.93-10.14) and active posterior tilt - 10.19 (CI 10.09-10.30) (

conclusionThe significant differences between the active and posterior tilt positions suggested that optimal muscle length of PM was affected by the inner range strength of the lower fibres of Trapezius. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: It is important that in clinical practice not only the length of PM in scapular misalignment but also the strength of the antagonistic muscles is considered.

Indexed as

length measurementsPectoralis and Minor musclepectoralis minor indexresting scapulaTrapezius muscles

Identifiers

PMID33241159
PMCPMC7670008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.