Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33241124›Full record

ArticleInnovation in aging2020

Caregiver Well-Being and Burden: Variations by Race/Ethnicity and Care Recipient Nativity Status.

Heehyul E Moon, William E Haley, Sunshine M Rote, Jeanelle S Sears

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation in aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Innovation in aging · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Support for Care Partners and Caregivers: 2023 Summit Session 5.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dementia Caregiving Experiences and Health Across Geographic Contexts by Race and Ethnicity.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Caregiving for Foreign-Born Older Adults With Dementia.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Effect of Support From Secondary Caregiver Network on Primary Caregiver Burden: Do Men and Women, Blacks and Whites Differ?The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Heehyul E MoonKent School of Social Work, University of Louisville, Kentucky.
William E HaleySchool of Aging Studies, College of Behavioral and Community Science, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Sunshine M RoteKent School of Social Work, University of Louisville, Kentucky.
Jeanelle S SearsDepartment of Human Services, Bowling Green State University, Ohio.
University of Louisville · USBowling Green State University · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

The National Health and Trends StudyU01AG032947 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VICKI A. FREEDMAN, JENNIFER ANN SCHRACK · 2008 to 2026
$169.4M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesDespite growing diversity among the aging population and extensive previous research on racial/ethnic minority caregivers, little research has been conducted on the potentially unique experiences and outcomes of informal caregivers of foreign-born care recipients. Using nationally representative data and the Stress Process Model, the current study examined the differences in caregiver outcomes (care burden, psychological well-being, and self-rated health) by care recipient nativity status (U.S.-born vs. foreign-born) and the extent to which caregiver outcomes vary by care recipient nativity status and caregiver race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, and Others). RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThe current study used Round 5 of the National Health and Aging Trends Study and the National Study of Caregiving (

resultsRegression analyses showed that only care burden significantly varied by care recipient nativity status after controlling for covariates. Caregivers of foreign-born care recipients reported a higher burden. However, when interactions of care recipient nativity status × caregiver race/ethnicity were introduced, non-Hispanic black and Hispanic caregivers of foreign-born care recipients were more likely to report better psychological well-being and self-rated health compared to their counterparts. Across caregiver groups, better caregiver-care recipient relationship quality and less caregiver chronic conditions were associated with less burden and better caregiver psychological well-being and self-rated health. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Care recipient nativity status and caregiver race/ethnicity may have complex effects on caregiving experiences. Given the observed significant interaction effects for caregiver psychological well-being and self-rated health, cultural factors may affect the extent to which these caregivers appraise their caregiving. Future research should delve into the appropriate ways to assess care stress as well as resilience among each caregiver group. Our results indicate the need for research, education, and practice that assess cultural and within-group differences among caregivers and inform needed changes to structural barriers.

Indexed as

CaregiversNational Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) and the National Study of Caregiving (NSOC)Nativity statusRace/ethnicity

Identifiers

PMID33241124
PMCPMC7679974
OpenAlexW3108971710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.