Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33241122›Full record

ArticleEmerging topics in life sciences2020

Protein Dynamics revealed by NMR Relaxation Methods.

Fa-An Chao, R Andrew Byrd

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging topics in life sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Unexpected temperature dependence ofMagnetic resonance letters · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fa-An ChaoStructural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702-1201.
R Andrew ByrdStructural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702-1201.
Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · US

Funding

Investigation of Protein-Protein Interactions in the ERAD Ubiquitylation PathwayZIABC011131 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI BYRD, ROBERT · 2009 to 2024
$12.0M
Structural Biology of GTPase Activating ProteinsZIABC011419 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI BYRD, ROBERT · 2011 to 2024
$8.4M
Methods DevelopmentZIABC011132 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI BYRD, ROBERT · 2009 to 2024
$4.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011131Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011132Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural biology often focuses primarily on three-dimensional structures of biological macromolecules, deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). This resource is a remarkable entity for the world-wide scientific and medical communities, as well as the general public, as it is a growing translation into three-dimensional space of the vast information in genomic databases, e.g. GENBANK. There is, however, significantly more to understanding biological function than the three-dimensional coordinate space for ground-state structures of biomolecules. The vast array of biomolecules experiences natural dynamics, interconversion between multiple conformational states, and molecular recognition and allosteric events that play out on timescales ranging from picoseconds to seconds. This wide range of timescales demands ingenious and sophisticated experimental tools to sample and interpret these motions, thus enabling clearer insight into functional annotation of the PDB. NMR spectroscopy is unique in its ability to sample this range of timescales at atomic resolution and in physiologically relevant conditions using spin relaxation methods. The field is constantly expanding to provide new creative experiments, to yield more detailed coverage of timescales, and to broaden the power of interpretation and analysis methods. This review highlights the current state of the methodology and examines the extension of analysis tools for more complex experiments and dynamic models. The future for understanding protein dynamics is bright, and these extended tools bring greater compatibility with developments in computational molecular dynamics, all of which will further our understanding of biological molecular functions. These facets place NMR as a key component in integrated structural biology.

Indexed as

HumansNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein ConformationProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID33241122
PMCPMC7685179
OpenAlexW2799837179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.