Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33241034›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2020

Effects of salvianolate on myocardial perfusion after primary percutaneous catheter intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Li Shen, Rende Xu, Jiasheng Yin, Hao Lu, Shuning Zhang, Zheyong Huang, Dong Huang, Hongying Liu, Juying Qian, Junbo Ge

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li ShenDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Rende XuDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiasheng YinDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hao LuDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shuning ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zheyong HuangDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Dong HuangDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hongying LiuShanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai, China.
Juying QianDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Junbo GeDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite prompt revascularization following acute myocardial infarction, poor myocardial perfusion commonly occurs due to impaired microvascular circulation and is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes. The current trial sought to examine the effects of salvianolate on myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who were undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

methodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study evaluated the effects of intravenous salvianolate on the achievement of complete epicardial and myocardial reperfusion after PCI, defined as thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade 3 and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction myocardial perfusion grade 3. We also measured plasma total creatine kinase-mass band fraction (CK-MB)-estimated infarct size and echocardiography-derived left ventricular ejection fraction and recorded the 30-day clinical and safety outcomes. A total of 536 patients presenting with acute STEMI were randomized to receive either an i.v. infusion of salvianolate (n=265) or placebo (n=271).

resultsSalvianolate administration exerted beneficial effects on coronary microcirculation. There was a trend of reduced myocardial infarct size in the salvianolate group compared to the placebo group (P=0.070), although no significant difference in left ventricular ejection fraction was found between the two groups.

conclusionsSalvianolate administration is associated with improved myocardial perfusion in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI. A larger study is required to assess the impact of this therapy on clinical cardiac outcomes.

Indexed as

coronary interventionmyocardial infarctionmyocardial perfusionprimary percutaneousSalvianolate

Identifiers

PMID33241034
PMCPMC7576095
OpenAlexW3088118404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.