ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2020
Automatic identification of compressions and ventilations during CPR based on the fuzzy c-means clustering and deep belief network.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of Enterprise Financial Risk Based on Clustering Algorithm.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA transthoracic impedance (TTI) signal is an important indicator of the quality of chest compressions (CCs) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We proposed an automatic detection algorithm including the wavelet decomposition, fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering, and deep belief network (DBN) to identify the compression and ventilation waveforms for evaluating the quality of CPR.
methodsTTI signals were collected from a cardiac arrest model that electrically induced cardiac arrest in pigs. All signals were denoised using the wavelet and morphology method. The potential compression and ventilation waveforms were marked using an algorithm with a multi-resolution window. The compressions and ventilations in these waveforms were identified and classified using the FCM clustering and DBN methods.
resultsUsing the FCM clustering method, the positive predictive values (PPVs) for compressions and ventilations were 99.7% and 95.7%, respectively. The sensitivities of recognition were 99.8% for compressions and 95.1% for ventilations. The DBN approach exhibited similar PPV and sensitivity results to the FCM clustering method. The time cost was satisfactory using either of these techniques.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that FCM clustering and DBN can be utilized to effectively and accurately evaluate CPR quality, and provide information for improving the success rate of CPR. Our real-time algorithms using FCM clustering and DBN eliminated most distortions and noises effectively, and correctly identified the compression and ventilation waveforms with a low time cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.