Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33240966›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2020

Ricardo M Stockler, Keah V Higgins, Haley Hallowell, Erin S Groover, Elizabeth M Hiltbold, Benjamin W Newcomer, Paul H Walz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ricardo M StocklerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Keah V HigginsDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Sciences and Mathematics, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Haley HallowellDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Sciences and Mathematics, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Erin S GrooverDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Elizabeth M HiltboldDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Sciences and Mathematics, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Benjamin W NewcomerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Paul H WalzDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Auburn University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome provides important metabolic functions for the host animal. Bacterial dysbiosis as a result of bacterial, viral, and parasitic gastrointestinal infections can adversely affect the metabolism, productivity, and overall health. The objective of this study is to characterize the commensal microbiome present in the lumen and the mucosal surface of the duodenum of cattle, as we hypothesize that due to metabolic processes and or host proprieties, there are differences in the natural microbiota present in the mucosal surface and luminal contents of the bovine duodenum. Duodenal lumen contents and mucosal biopsies were collected from six dairy crossbred yearling steers. A flexible video-endoscope was used to harvest biopsy samples

Indexed as

bovine microbiomeduodenal cannulationGIT microbiomein vivo microbiomemetagenomic analyses

Identifiers

PMID33240966
PMCPMC7680733
OpenAlexW3104992311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.