ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2020
The Power of a Positive Human-Animal Relationship for Animal Welfare.
Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
96 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Step Too Far? Public Perceptions on Navigating the Introduction of Robot Technologies into the Human-Animal Relationship in Agriculture.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Interspecies Relationships inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Influence of Farmer-Sheep Interactions in the Home Flock on Behaviour and Cortisol in a Communal Grazing Flock of Polish Mountain Sheep.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Ethics of the Design of Animal-like Robots.Science and engineering ethics · 2026Article
- Tactile Preferences in Goats: Implications for Animal-Assisted Interventions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- The Influence of Environmental and Genetic Factors and Training Background on the Welfare of Herding Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Does a Lack of Early Intensive Socialisation with Humans Exclude Goats from Participating in Animal-Assisted Services?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Exploring wanting and liking during positive human-animal interactions.Psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Animal Welfare Assessment in Cattle Breeding in the Natural Savannah of the Colombian Orinoquia.Veterinary medicine international · 2026Article
- Advancing evidence-informed practice in modern zoos: research priorities for animal welfare, conservation, and social legitimacy.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Article
- Analgesic combinations to reduce the stress/pain responses in ewes submitted to non-surgical embryo recovery: butorphanol associated with meloxicam or with dipyrone/hyoscine.Animal reproduction · 2026Article
- Gentle human interactions trigger positive emotions in chicks.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2026Article
- Post-pandemic one health: Unpacking the role of greenspaces and human-dog interactions in long-term health and well-being.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- The Effects of Light on Vertebrate Welfare: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- The Effect of Environment and Husbandry Practices on Sheep Welfare.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- The role of human-pig interactions in modulating gut microbiota, stress, and performance.Porcine health management · 2025Article
- Assessing the knowledge of ethical clearance and animal welfare among researchers in Indonesia: A cross-sectional study.Veterinary world · 2025Article
- Natural Savanna Systems Within the "One Health and One Welfare" Approach: Part 2-Sociodemographic and Institution Factors Impacting Relationships Between Farmers and Livestock.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Chickens perceive humans as social buffers and may follow human-given cues: A pilot study.Poultry science · 2025Article
36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Domestic animals often seek and enjoy interacting with humans. Positive human-animal relationships can elicit positive emotions and other positive welfare outcomes. Nevertheless, our understanding of the underlying processes that govern the positive perception of humans by animals is incomplete. We cover the potential mechanisms involved in the development and maintenance of positive human-animal relationships from the perspective of the animal. This encompasses habituation, associative learning, and possibly attachment or bonding based on communication and social cognition. We review the indicators from the literature to assess a positive human-animal relationship. We operationally define this positive relationship as the animal showing voluntary approach and spatial proximity (seeking) and signs of anticipation, pleasure, relaxation, or other indicators of a rewarding experience from interacting with the human. For research, we recommend accounting for the baseline human-animal relationship in the animal's everyday life, and incorporating a control treatment rather than only comparing positive to negative interaction treatments. Furthermore, animal characteristics, such as previous experience, genetics, and individual predisposition, as well as contextual characteristics related to the social and physical environment, may modulate the perception of humans by animals. The human-animal relationship is also influenced by human characteristics, such as the person's familiarity to the animal, attitudes, skills, and knowledge. We highlight implications for current practices and suggest simple solutions, such as paying attention to the animal's behavioral response to humans and providing choice and control to the animal in terms of when and how to interact with humans. Practical applications to achieve a positive perception of humans could be better utilized, such as by incorporating training principles, while keeping in mind trust and safety of both partners. Overall, there is growing evidence in the scientific literature that a positive human-animal relationship can bring intrinsic rewards to the animals and thereby benefit animal welfare. Further research is needed on the underlying processes to establish an effective positive human-animal relationship, especially in regard to the type, frequency, and length of human interaction necessary. In particular, the importance of providing animals with a sense of agency over their interactions with humans remains poorly understood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.