Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33240957›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2020

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Global Food Security.

Fernando O Mardones, Karl M Rich, Lisa A Boden, Andrea I Moreno-Switt, Marisa L Caipo, Natalia Zimin-Veselkoff, Abdulaziz M Alateeqi, Isabelle Baltenweck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
31.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Perpetuation of household food insecurity during COVID-19 in South Africa.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Fernando O MardonesSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University, Santiago, Chile.
Karl M RichInternational Livestock Research Institute, West Africa Regional Office, Dakar, Senegal.
Lisa A BodenGlobal Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Andrea I Moreno-SwittSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University, Santiago, Chile.
Marisa L CaipoFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago, Chile.
Natalia Zimin-VeselkoffSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University, Santiago, Chile.
Abdulaziz M AlateeqiKuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Isabelle BaltenweckInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLInternational Livestock Research Institute · KEKuwait Institute for Scientific Research · KWRoslin Institute · GBUnited Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present scientific perspectives on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and global food security. International organizations and current evidence based on other respiratory viruses suggests COVID-19 is not a food safety issue, i.e., there is no evidence associating food or food packaging with the transmission of the virus causing COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2), yet an abundance of precaution for this exposure route seems appropriate. The pandemic, however, has had a dramatic impact on the food system, with direct and indirect consequences on lives and livelihoods of people, plants, and animals. Given the complexity of the system at risk, it is likely that some of these consequences are still to emerge over time. To date, the direct and indirect consequences of the pandemic have been substantial including restrictions on agricultural workers, planting, current and future harvests; shifts in agricultural livelihoods and food availability; food safety; plant and animal health and animal welfare; human nutrition and health; along with changes in public policies. All aspects are crucial to food security that would require "One Health" approaches as the concept may be able to manage risks in a cost-effective way with cross-sectoral, coordinated investments in human, environmental, and animal health. Like climate change, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic will be most acutely felt by the poorest and most vulnerable countries and communities. Ultimately, to prepare for future outbreaks or threats to food systems, we must take into account the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations and a "Planetary Health" perspective.

Indexed as

animal productionCOVID-19food safetyfood securityOne HealthPlanetary HealthSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33240957
PMCPMC7683609
OpenAlexW3103720642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.