Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33240694›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Simulation as a Platform for Development of Entrustable Professional Activities: A Modular, Longitudinal Approach.

Dana J Herrigel, Colleen Donovan, Elizabeth Goodman, Archana Pradhan, Mary M Bridgeman, Lauren Hogshire, Christine Fanning, Anastasia Whitman, Michael Maniaci, Sarang Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dana J HerrigelHospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, USA.
Colleen DonovanEmergency Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, USA.
Elizabeth GoodmanPediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, USA.
Archana PradhanObstetrics and Gynecology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, USA.
Mary M BridgemanPharmacy Practice and Administration, Rutgers University, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Piscataway, USA.
Lauren HogshireHospital Internal Medicine, Princeton Plainsboro Medical Center, Princeton, USA.
Christine FanningHospital Internal Medicine, Princeton Plainsboro Medical Center, Princeton, USA.
Anastasia WhitmanHospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, USA.
Michael ManiaciHospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, USA.
Sarang KimInternal Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) has recently identified a list of integrated activities to be expected of all medical school graduates entering residency: the core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs). Direct observation and deliberate practice of individual EPA behaviors in the clinical setting has multiple challenges, and there is limited literature describing a comprehensive, longitudinal curriculum dedicated to formative EPA assessment.  Approach We present a model curriculum to develop and provide formative assessment of EPA skills longitudinally throughout the clinical years. Each EPA-focused training session includes a simulation case followed by several small group activities with content related to the clinical vignette in the initial simulation. We have designed this curriculum to be longitudinal and modular, and present the general framework here.  Outcomes Step-wise implementation began in 2013. Over 450 medical students have participated in the third year (MS3) clerkship sessions, 30 in the MS4 sub-internship sessions, and over 300 thus far in the fourth year (MS4) capstone course, including students from 10 different medical schools. MS3 sessions focused on EPAs 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, and MS4 sessions had an additional focus on EPA 8. The capstone course encompassed nearly all 13 EPAs in active simulation-based learning. Opportunities to provide formative assessment through on-the-spot feedback exist throughout the curriculum. Student feedback was overwhelmingly positive. Next steps We found that simulations are an effective method of providing formative assessment of EPAs that are exceptionally well-received by medical students. We have demonstrated that these can be implemented for medical students from multiple educational backgrounds. We believe that deliberate practice and longitudinal formative assessment is of utmost importance in effectively developing core EPAs prior to final entrustment decisions.

Indexed as

curriculumentrustmentepamedical educationsimulation

Identifiers

PMID33240694
PMCPMC7681749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.