Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33240624›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

The genetic diversity and population structure of two endemic Amazonian quillwort (

Mirella Pupo Santos, João V S Rabelo Araujo, Arthur V Sant'anna Lopes, Julio Cesar Fiorio Vettorazzi, Marcela Santana Bastos Boechat, Fernanda AbreuSantana Arêdes, Naiara Viana Campos, Emiliano Nicolas Calderon, Fernando M Gomes Santos, Tais Nogueira Fernandes and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Mirella Pupo SantosInstituto de Sustentabilidade e Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
João V S Rabelo AraujoInstituto de Sustentabilidade e Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Arthur V Sant'anna LopesInstituto de Sustentabilidade e Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Julio Cesar Fiorio VettorazziLaboratório de Melhoramento Genético Vegetal, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Marcela Santana Bastos BoechatLaboratório de Melhoramento Genético Vegetal, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fernanda AbreuSantana ArêdesLaboratório de Melhoramento Genético Vegetal, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Naiara Viana CamposInstituto de Sustentabilidade e Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Emiliano Nicolas CalderonInstituto de Sustentabilidade e Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fernando M Gomes SantosEnvironmental Studies Office, Vale, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Tais Nogueira FernandesEnvironmental Studies Office, Vale, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Rodrigo Nunes da FonsecaInstituto de Sustentabilidade e Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Messias Gonzaga PereiraLaboratório de Melhoramento Genético Vegetal, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Guilherme OliveiraInstituto Tecnológico Vale, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Daniel Basilio ZandonadiInstituto de Sustentabilidade e Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
RodrigoLemes MartinsInstituto de Sustentabilidade e Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Francisco de Assis EstevesInstituto de Sustentabilidade e Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwo endemic lycophyte species

methodsThe genetic diversity and population structure of

resultsThe sixteen primers produced 115 reproducible bands, 87% of which were polymorphic. A high level of polymorphic loci (81.74% and 68.48%) and a high Shannon index (Sh = 0.376 and 0.289) were observed for

Indexed as

Gene flowIsoetes cangaeIsoetes serracarajensisISSRLycophyteMating system

Identifiers

PMID33240624
PMCPMC7659625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.