ArticlePeerJ2020
Differential expression between drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive sugarcane under mild and moderate water stress as revealed by a comparative analysis of leaf transcriptome.
Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Transcriptional regulation reveals potent drought tolerance mechanisms in contrasting genotypes of Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Functional divergence of CAD-like family genes in Saccharum complex under biotic and abiotic stress.Plant cell reports · 2025Article
- Drought Adaptation and Responses ofEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Integrated transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic analyses revealing the roles of amino acid and sucrose metabolism in augmenting drought tolerance inFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- A Large-Scale Candidate-Gene Association Mapping for Drought Tolerance and Agronomic Traits in Sugarcane.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Transcriptomic and Proteomic Landscape of Sugarcane Response to Biotic and Abiotic Stressors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Global Responses of Autopolyploid Sugarcane Badila (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Comparative transcriptomic analyses of two sugarcaneFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Sampling strategies for sugarcane using either clonal replicates or diverse genotypes can bias the conclusions of RNA-Seq studies.Genetics and molecular biology · 2023Article
- Drought-triggered leaf transcriptional responses disclose key molecular pathways underlying leaf water use efficiency in sugarcane (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Unravelling the molecular mechanism underlying drought stress response in chickpeaFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Key factors for differential drought tolerance in two contrasting wild materials of Artemisia wellbyi identified using comparative transcriptomics.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Leaf transcriptome profiling of contrasting sugarcane genotypes for drought tolerance under field conditions.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Effect of drought on photosynthesis, total antioxidant capacity, bioactive component accumulation, and the transcriptome of Atractylodes lancea.BMC plant biology · 2021Article
- Transcriptional Regulation in Roots by Bacteria With 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylate Deaminase Enzymes for Drought Tolerance and Post-Stress Recovery.Physiologia plantarumArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sugarcane contributes 80% of global sugar production and to bioethanol generation for the bioenergy industry. Its productivity is threatened by drought that can cause up to 60% yield loss. This study used RNA-Seq to gain a better understanding of the underlying mechanism by which drought-tolerant sugarcane copes with water stress. We compared gene expression in KPS01-12 (drought-tolerant genotype) and UT12 (drought-sensitive genotype) that have significantly different yield loss rates under drought conditions. We treated KPS01-12 and UT12 with mild and moderate water stress and found differentially expressed genes in various biological processes. KPS01-12 had higher expression of genes that were involved in water retention, antioxidant secondary metabolite biosynthesis, and oxidative and osmotic stress response than UT12. In contrast, the sensitive genotype had more down-regulated genes that were involved in photosynthesis, carbon fixation and Calvin cycle than the tolerant genotype. Our obtained expression profiles suggest that the tolerant sugarcane has a more effective genetic response than the sensitive genotype at the initiation of drought stress. The knowledge gained from this study may be applied in breeding programs to improve sugarcane production in drought conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.