Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33240548›Full record

ArticleThe South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa2020

How do family members perceive re-integration of male state patients into their families in South Africa? A qualitative analysis.

Ndivhaleni R Lavhelani, Mary Maluleke, Mulatedzi P Mulaudzi, Thingahangwi C Masutha, Takalani E Makhubele, Duppy Manyuma, Muofheni Nemathaga, Ndiambani A Makhavhu, Martha L Kharivhe, Takalani E Mbedzi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ndivhaleni R LavhelaniLimpopo Department of Health, Hayani Psychiatric Hospital, Vhembe District, Thohoyandou, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8537-3428
Mary MalulekeDepartment of Advanced Nursing Science, School of Health, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0035-9710
Mulatedzi P MulaudziLimpopo Department of Health, Hayani Psychiatric Hospital, Vhembe District, Thohoyandou, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2371-640X
Thingahangwi C MasuthaDepartment of Health, Faculty of Nursing, Limpopo College of Nursing, Thohoyandou, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3515-2496
Takalani E MakhubeleLimpopo Department of Health, Tshilwavhusiku Clinic, Vhembe District, Thohoyandou, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1029-2484
Duppy ManyumaUnited Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) Programme, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6129-6381
Muofheni NemathagaLimpopo Department of Health, Hayani Psychiatric Hospital, Vhembe District, Thohoyandou, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9703-1668
Ndiambani A MakhavhuLimpopo Department of Health, Tshilidzini Hospital, Thohoyandou, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3335-6479
Martha L KharivheLimpopo Department of Health, Louis Trichardt Memorial Hospital, Thohoyandou, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3228-1535
Takalani E MbedziDepartment of Advanced Nursing Science, School of Health, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4793-0307
Muvhango R RamovhaLimpopo Department of Health, Vhembe District, Thohoyandou, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3629-9740
Dorah U RamathubaDepartment of Advanced Nursing Science, School of Health, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7571-4767
Mutshinyalo L NetshikwetaDepartment of Advanced Nursing Science, School of Health, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4353-8703
University of Venda · ZAOffice of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees · CHUniversity of Limpopo · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundState patients are admitted to a psychiatric hospital after being declared as such by the magistrate courts as a result of not found fit to stand trial for the offence they had committed. After successful rehabilitation of state patients at the psychiatric hospital, they need to be re-integrated into their families. Family members' perceptions regarding re-integration of male state patients are not largely explored in the scientific body of knowledge.

aimThe aim of the study was to determine the perceptions of family members regarding reintegration of male state patients into their families.

settingThis study was conducted in Vhembe District of Limpopo province, South Africa.

methodA qualitative approach using explorative, descriptive and contextual designs was adopted. In-depth interviews were conducted with 10 family members who were purposefully sampled, and data were thematically analysed using Tech Open Coding method.

resultsThree themes emerged, namely, family members understand re-integration; family members' expectations from a mental healthcare user; and threat to re-integration as perceived by family members.

conclusionData revealed that family members have varied perceptions regarding re-integration. These perceptions were based on the behaviour displayed or an offence committed by the mental healthcare user before admission and how participants experienced it. The study recommends that an investigation is to be conducted on the kind of support family members need regarding re-integration of state patients into their families.

Indexed as

familyhealth establishmentre-integrationstate patientsupport

Identifiers

PMID33240548
PMCPMC7670001
OpenAlexW3092519624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.