ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2020
Prescribing cascades in persons with Alzheimer's disease: engaging patients, caregivers, and providers in a qualitative evaluation of print educational materials.
Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of medication management interventions on healthcare utilisation in people with dementia: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Age and ageing · 2026Pooled it
- Co-design-related approaches in medication safety for people with dementia: A scoping review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Prescription cascades associated with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors use: a high-throughput sequence symmetry analysis.Age and ageing · 2026Article
- Decision-Making and Downstream Outcomes of the Gabapentinoid-Diuretic Prescribing Cascade.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Pharmacy-led interventions to reverse and prevent prescribing cascades in primary care: a proof-of-concept study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Article
- Medication management information priorities of people living with dementia and their carers: a scoping review.Age and ageing · 2024Article
- Article
- Research on prescribing cascades: a scoping review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- The US Food and Drug Administration Sentinel System: a national resource for a learning health system.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- "Kind of blurry": Deciphering clues to prevent, investigate and manage prescribing cascades.PloS one · 2022Article
- Motivating deprescribing conversations for patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: a descriptive study.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPrescribing cascades occur when the side effect of a drug is misinterpreted as a new medical condition, and a second drug is prescribed to address the side effect. Persons with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are at increased risk of prescribing cascades due to greater multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and complexity of care. The objective of this study was to evaluate educational materials about prescribing cascades in persons with AD, and elicit input on their use in a future trial.
methodsWe interviewed community-dwelling adults with either an AD diagnosis or a prescription drug used to treat AD (
resultsAnalysis of patients', caregivers', and providers' comments suggest: (a) Providers had conflicting views about the messaging of materials; (b) Caregivers were likely to read letters addressed to patients; (c) Providers were likely to ignore letters, but were receptive to patient/caregiver-initiated conversations; (d) Patients and caregivers had difficulty understanding prescribing cascades; (e) Providers worried that mailed materials would undermine trust; (f) Participants had mixed views on how materials might affect the clinical encounter; (g) Participants felt that materials would improve patient/caregiver engagement. When surveyed, most providers found the revised materials informative and actionable, and most caregivers found them understandable and useful.
conclusionsThis evaluation of educational materials about prescribing cascades in patients with AD provides strong support for engaging caregivers to communicate with providers about prescribing cascades. By giving patients and caregivers a basic description of the prescribing cascade concept, our educational materials may help them prepare for a conversation with the provider, who can then tailor the discussion of the possible cascade to the specific needs of the individual patient and caregiver. However, evidence on whether materials can stimulate such conversations awaits testing in a future trial. LAY SUMMARY:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.