Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33240470›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020

The era of big data: Genome-scale modelling meets machine learning.

Athanasios Antonakoudis, Rodrigo Barbosa, Pavlos Kotidis, Cleo Kontoravdi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Reconstruction of a Genome-Scale Metabolic Model forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Population health management fit lifecycles in analytics.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Athanasios AntonakoudisDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Rodrigo BarbosaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Pavlos KotidisDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Cleo KontoravdiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With omics data being generated at an unprecedented rate, genome-scale modelling has become pivotal in its organisation and analysis. However, machine learning methods have been gaining ground in cases where knowledge is insufficient to represent the mechanisms underlying such data or as a means for data curation prior to attempting mechanistic modelling. We discuss the latest advances in genome-scale modelling and the development of optimisation algorithms for network and error reduction, intracellular constraining and applications to strain design. We further review applications of supervised and unsupervised machine learning methods to omics datasets from microbial and mammalian cell systems and present efforts to harness the potential of both modelling approaches through hybrid modelling.

Indexed as

Cell metabolismChinese hamster ovary cellsFlux balance analysisHybrid modellingPrincipal component analysisRecombinant protein productionStrain optimisation

Identifiers

PMID33240470
PMCPMC7663219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.