Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33240342›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD2019

YouTube videos as health decision aids for the public: An integrative review.

Kimberly Haslam, Heather Doucette, Shauna Hachey, Teanne MacCallum, Denise Zwicker, Martha Smith-Brilliant, Robert Gilbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Source-Dependent Quality Variation in Shoulder Dislocation Videos on YouTube.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  17. A content-quality and optimization analysis of YouTube as a source of patient information for bipolar disorder.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kimberly HaslamSchool of Dental Hygiene, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Heather DoucetteSchool of Dental Hygiene, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Shauna HacheySchool of Dental Hygiene, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Teanne MacCallumSchool of Dental Hygiene, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Denise ZwickerSchool of Dental Hygiene, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Martha Smith-BrilliantSchool of Dental Hygiene, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Robert GilbertSchool of Health Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the potential value of YouTube videos as health decision aids for the public.

methodsAn integrative review was performed to explore 3 questions: 1) What is the validity of health-related YouTube videos created for the public? 2) Are YouTube videos an effective tool for supporting the public in decision making regarding the treatment, prevention, and diagnosis of disease? 3) How can health professionals ensure their videos will be readily accessible to those searching online for health-related information? Systematic searches of PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science were conducted. The returns were screened using inclusion and exclusion criteria and studies found were critically appraised.

resultsFifty-eight studies assessed the validity of videos on given topics and 9 studies examined the effectiveness of videos in supporting decision making. These studies demonstrated that the majority of health-related YouTube videos lack validity. However, evidence-based videos do exist and have the potential to be an effective instrument in supporting the public in making health decisions. Ten studies examined ways to increase the accessibility of such videos to the public. DISCUSSION: Creators of evidence-based videos must take into consideration content and content-agnostic factors to improve the accessibility of their videos to searchers. Recommendations to support creators in making their evidence-based health videos readily accessible to the public are provided.

conclusionsBy exploiting appropriate content and content-agnostic factors, video creators can ensure that valid health information is readily accessible to information seekers.

Indexed as

consumer health informationhealth knowledgeinformation disseminationreviewsocial mediaYouTube

Identifiers

PMID33240342
PMCPMC7533808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.