Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33240334›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020

Expression Partitioning of Duplicate Genes at Single Cell Resolution in

Jeremy E Coate, Andrew D Farmer, John W Schiefelbein, Jeff J Doyle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. CryptoCEN: A Co-Expression Network forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The evolving definition of plant cell type.Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Cell types as species: Exploring a metaphor.Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy E CoateDepartment of Biology, Reed College, Portland, OR, United States.
Andrew D FarmerNational Center for Genome Resources, Santa Fe, NM, United States.
John W SchiefelbeinDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Jeff J DoyleSchool of Integrative Plant Science, Plant Biology Section, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Cornell University · USNational Center for Genome Resources · USReed College · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene duplication is a key evolutionary phenomenon, prevalent in all organisms but particularly so in plants, where whole genome duplication (WGD; polyploidy) is a major force in genome evolution. Much effort has been expended in attempting to understand the evolution of duplicate genes, addressing such questions as why some paralog pairs rapidly return to single copy status whereas, in other pairs, both paralogs are retained and may diverge in expression pattern or function. The effect of a gene - its site of expression and thus the initial locus of its function - occurs at the level of a cell comprising a single cell type at a given state of the cell's development. Using

Indexed as

cell statecell typeexpression subfunctionalizationgene duplicationpolyploidysingle cell RNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID33240334
PMCPMC7670048
OpenAlexW3096321596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.