Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33240331›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020

Identification of Ginger (

Yao Lv, Yanyan Li, Xiaohui Liu, Kun Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. qPCR-Based Reference Gene Validation inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular identification and pathogenic impact ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Physiological and molecular mechanism of ginger (Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yao LvCollege of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China.
Yanyan LiCollege of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China.
Xiaohui LiuSchool of Environment, Tsinghua University, Qingdao, China.
Kun XuCollege of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) is widely used in the detection of gene expression level. However, there is no suitable ginger reference gene for qPCR analysis. Therefore, it is the primary task to select and validate the appropriate ginger reference gene to normalize the expression of target genes. In this study, 14 candidate reference genes were selected and analyzed in different tissues (leaf, and rhizome), different development stages, different varieties, and abiotic stress (ABA and salt stress). Expression stability was calculated using geNorm and NormFinder, Bestkeeper, and RefFinder. For abiotic stress and total conditions, 28S and COX were identified as the most stable genes. In addition, RPII was the most stable in the different development stages and different varieties. TEF2 and RPL2 were the least stably expressed in the tissue and all the conditions. In order to verify the feasibility of these genes as reference genes, we used the most stable and least stable reference genes to normalize the expression levels of

Indexed as

gene expressiongingernormalizationqRT-PCRreference gene

Identifiers

PMID33240331
PMCPMC7670040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.