Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33240067›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2020

Capturing Human Interaction in the Virtual Age: A Perspective on the Future of fNIRS Hyperscanning.

Stephanie Balters, Joseph M Baker, Grace Hawthorne, Allan L Reiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Social attachment shapes interbrain synchrony.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Virtual (Zoom) Interactions Alter Conversational Behavior and Interbrain Coherence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephanie BaltersDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Joseph M BakerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Grace HawthorneHasso Plattner Institute of Design, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Allan L ReissDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

Funding

TRAINING FOR CHILD PSYCHIATRY AND CHILD DEVELOPMENTT32MH019908 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI IAN H GOTLIB, DAVID S HONG · 1993 to 2026
$6.3M
Gene, Brain and Behavior in Turner SyndromeR01HD049653 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REISS, ALLAN L · 2006 to 2016
$6.0M
High-density, MR-compatible functional near-infrared spectroscopy system for advancing clinical neuroscience and cognitive brain research in infants, children, adolescents, and adultsS10OD026925 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REISS, ALLAN L · 2019 to 2019
$587k
Brain Development & Sex Chromosomes: Imaging of Turner and Klinefelter SyndromesR21MH099630 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REISS, ALLAN L · 2013 to 2014
$432k
Investigation of the role of Turner syndrome on approximate number senseK99HD092883 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BAKER, JOSEPH · 2018 to 2020
$327k
NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD092883NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD049653NIH HHS S10 OD026925NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH099630NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in video conferencing capabilities combined with dramatic socio-dynamic shifts brought about by COVID-19, have redefined the ways in which humans interact in modern society. From business meetings to medical exams, or from classroom instruction to yoga class, virtual interfacing has permeated nearly every aspect of our daily lives. A seemingly endless stream of technological advances combined with our newfound reliance on virtual interfacing makes it likely that humans will continue to use this modern form of social interaction into the future. However, emergent evidence suggests that virtual interfacing may not be equivalent to face-to-face interactions. Ultimately, too little is currently understood about the mechanisms that underlie human interactions over the virtual divide, including how these mechanisms differ from traditional face-to-face interaction. Here, we propose functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) hyperscanning-simultaneous measurement of two or more brains-as an optimal approach to quantify potential neurocognitive differences between virtual and in-person interactions. We argue that increased focus on this understudied domain will help elucidate the reasons why virtual conferencing doesn't always stack up to in-person meetings and will also serve to spur new technologies designed to improve the virtual interaction experience. On the basis of existing fNIRS hyperscanning literature, we highlight the current gaps in research regarding virtual interactions. Furthermore, we provide insight into current hurdles regarding fNIRS hyperscanning hardware and methodology that should be addressed in order to shed light on this newly critical element of everyday life.

Indexed as

fNIRSfunctional near-infrared spectroscopyhyperscanningsocial interactionvirtual interaction

Identifiers

PMID33240067
PMCPMC7669622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.