Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33240059›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2020

N-Back Related ERPs Depend on Stimulus Type, Task Structure, Pre-processing, and Lab Factors.

Mahsa Alizadeh Shalchy, Valentina Pergher, Anja Pahor, Marc M Van Hulle, Aaron R Seitz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05910372 (Development of Complementary Tools for the Differential Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia Based on Cognitive Task Performance), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05910372 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Development of Complementary Tools for the Differential Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia Based on Cognitive Task Performance

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Council of Scientific and Technical Research, ArgentinaRan2023 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsFibromyalgiaArmsColor Comparison Task, N-back Task
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mahsa Alizadeh ShalchyDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
Valentina PergherDepartment of Neurosciences, Laboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anja PahorDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
Marc M Van HulleDepartment of Neurosciences, Laboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Aaron R SeitzDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.

Funding

Understanding Mediating and Moderating Factors that Determine Transfer of Working Memory TrainingR01MH111742 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI Susanne M Jaeggi, Aaron R Seitz · 2016 to 2026
$5.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The N-Back, a common working memory (WM) updating task, is increasingly used in basic and applied psychological research. As such, an increasing number of electroencephalogram (EEG) studies have sought to identify the electrophysiological signatures of N-Back task performance. However,

Indexed as

cross-laboratoryERPsexperimental featuresN-Backpre-processingworking memory

Identifiers

PMID33240059
PMCPMC7668114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.