Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33240036›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Sex Differences in Vagus Nerve Stimulation Effects on Rat Cardiovascular and Immune Systems.

Farid Yaghouby, Kee Jang, Uyen Hoang, Sepideh Asgari, Srikanth Vasudevan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Farid YaghoubyU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), Office of Science and Engineering Laboratory (OSEL), Division of Biomedical Physics (DBP), Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Kee JangU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), Office of Science and Engineering Laboratory (OSEL), Division of Biomedical Physics (DBP), Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Uyen HoangU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), Office of Science and Engineering Laboratory (OSEL), Division of Biomedical Physics (DBP), Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Sepideh AsgariU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), Office of Science and Engineering Laboratory (OSEL), Division of Biomedical Physics (DBP), Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Srikanth VasudevanU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), Office of Science and Engineering Laboratory (OSEL), Division of Biomedical Physics (DBP), Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Office of Science · USCenter for Devices and Radiological Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvestigations into the benefits of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) through pre-clinical and clinical research have led to promising findings for treating several disorders. Despite proven effectiveness of VNS on conditions such as epilepsy and depression, understanding of off-target effects and contributing factors such as sex differences can be beneficial to optimize therapy design. NEW

methodsIn this article, we assessed longitudinal effects of VNS on cardiovascular and immune systems, and studied potential sex differences using a rat model of long-term VNS. Rats were implanted with cuff electrodes around the left cervical vagus nerve for VNS, and wireless physiological monitoring devices for continuous monitoring of cardiovascular system using electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. ECG morphology and heart rate variability (HRV) features were extracted to assess cardiovascular changes resulting from VNS in short-term and long-term timescales. We also assessed VNS effects on expression of inflammatory cytokines in blood during the course of the experiment. Statistical analysis was performed to compare results between Treatment and Sham groups, and between male and female animals from Treatment and Sham groups.

resultsConsiderable differences between male and female rats in cardiovascular effects of VNS were observed in multiple cardiovascular features. However, the effects seemed to be transient with approximately 1-h recovery after VNS. While short-term cardiovascular effects were mainly observed in male rats, females in general showed more significant long-term effects even after VNS stopped. We did not observe notable changes or sex differences in systemic cytokine levels resulting from VNS. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodsCompared to existing methods, our study design incorporated wireless physiological monitoring and systemic blood cytokine level analysis, along with long-term VNS experiments in unanesthetized rats to study sex differences.

conclusionThe contribution of sex differences for long-term VNS off-target effects on cardiovascular and immune systems was assessed using awake behaving rats. Although VNS did not change the concentration of inflammatory biomarkers in systemic circulation for male and female rats, we observed significant differences in cardiovascular effects of VNS characterized using ECG morphology and HRV analyses.

Indexed as

cardiovascular systemimmune systemneuromodulationsex differencesvagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID33240036
PMCPMC7677457
OpenAlexW3095446128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.