Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33239884›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2020

Global Current Practices of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients: An International Survey.

Jaber S Alqahtani, Renata G Mendes, Abdulelah Aldhahir, Daniel Rowley, Mohammed D AlAhmari, George Ntoumenopoulos, Saeed M Alghamdi, Jithin K Sreedharan, Yousef S Aldabayan, Tope Oyelade and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. COVID-19: Opportunities to Improve Prognosis.Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Acute respiratory distress syndrome.Lancet (London, England) · 2021
    Review
  13. Thoracic imaging outcomes in COVID-19 survivors.World journal of radiology · 2021
    Review
  14. Smoking cessation during COVID-19: the top to-do list.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jaber S AlqahtaniUCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1795-5092
Renata G MendesDepartment of Physical Therapy, Cardiopulmonary Physiotherapy Laboratory, Federal University of São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4683-2657
Abdulelah AldhahirUCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4270-9494
Daniel RowleyPulmonary Diagnostics & Respiratory Therapy Services, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Mohammed D AlAhmariDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
George NtoumenopoulosConsultant Physiotherapist, Physiotherapy Department St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Saeed M AlghamdiNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6677-1110
Jithin K SreedharanDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3043-7548
Yousef S AldabayanRespiratory Care, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Tope OyeladeUCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1151-0295
Ahmed AlrajehRespiratory Care, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2559-416X
Carlo OlivieriEmergency Department, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, Vercelli 13100, Italy.
Maher AlQuaimiImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7583-2624
Jerome SullivanPresident, International Council for Respiratory Care, Professor Emeritus & Respiratory Care Program Director, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Mohammed A AlmeshariRehabilitation Health Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8449-9491
Antonio EsquinasDirector International NIV School, Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0571-2050

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the global outbreak of COVID-19 continues to ravage the world, it is important to understand how frontline clinicians manage ventilatory support and the various limiting factors.

methodsAn online survey composed of 32 questions was developed and validated by an international expert panel.

resultsOverall, 502 respondents from 40 countries across six continents completed the survey. The mean number (±SD) of ICU beds was 64 ± 84. The most popular initial diagnostic tools used for treatment initiation were arterial blood gas (48%) and clinical presentation (37.5%), while the national COVID-19 guidelines were the most used (61.2%). High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) (53.8%), non-invasive ventilation (NIV) (47%), and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (92%) were mostly used for mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 cases, respectively. However, only 38.8%, 56.6% and 82.9% of the respondents had standard protocols for HFNC, NIV, and IMV, respectively. The most frequently used modes of IMV and NIV were volume control (VC) (36.1%) and continuous positive airway pressure/pressure support (CPAP/PS) (40.6%). About 54% of the respondents did not adhere to the recommended, regular ventilator check interval. The majority of the respondents (85.7%) used proning with IMV, with 48.4% using it for 12-16 hours, and 46.2% had tried awake proning in combination with HFNC or NIV. Increased staff workload (45.02%), lack of trained staff (44.22%) and shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) (42.63%) were the main barriers to COVID-19 management.

conclusionOur results show that general clinical practices involving ventilatory support were highly heterogeneous, with limited use of standard protocols and most frontline clinicians depending on isolated and varied management guidelines. We found increased staff workload, lack of trained staff and shortage of PPE to be the main limiting factors affecting global COVID-19 ventilatory support management.

Indexed as

clinical managementCOVID-19HFNCmechanical ventilationNIVproningrespiratoryventilation

Identifiers

PMID33239884
PMCPMC7680685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.