ArticleJournal of human hypertension2021
Difference in hypertension prevalence applying three childhood hypertension management guidelines in a national cohort study.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and risk factors for hypertension among children and adolescents in Shaanxi province, Northwestern China, according to the three hypertension guidelines.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessment of cardiovascular disease risk factors in Korean children: impact of various pediatric hypertension guidelines and application of the Korean blood pressure reference.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of adolescent hypertension definitions for predicting early adulthood carotid artery intima-media thickness: Tehran lipid and glucose study.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2024Article
- Association of Birthweight with Overweight, Obesity, and Blood Pressure among Adolescents.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Difference in the Prevalence of Elevated Blood Pressure and Hypertension by References in Korean Children and Adolescents.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recently updated their childhood hypertension management guidelines. We aimed to compare the hypertension prevalence determined using the two aforementioned guidelines and Fourth Report in a national cohort study. This 4.6-year follow-up study included 4276 children who had participated in the China Health and Nutrition Study. At baseline and during a follow-up survey, hypertension was defined using the three guidelines. We calculated the pediatric hypertension prevalence in at least one survey and in both surveys as the number of participants identified as hypertensive in at least one survey or in both surveys divided by 4276, respectively. Using Mc Nemar's test, we determined that the prevalence of pediatric hypertension differed significantly according to AAP vs. ESH guidelines and Fourth Report at the baseline (8.3% vs. 5.0% and 5.0%, respectively; reference, AAP; P
Indexed as
Identifiers
33239743What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.