Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33239615›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

A versatile and customizable low-cost 3D-printed open standard for microscopic imaging.

Benedict Diederich, René Lachmann, Swen Carlstedt, Barbora Marsikova, Haoran Wang, Xavier Uwurukundo, Alexander S Mosig, Rainer Heintzmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
22.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Benedict DiederichLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, Albert-Einstein-Straβe 9, 07745, Jena, Germany. benedictdied@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0453-6286
René LachmannLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, Albert-Einstein-Straβe 9, 07745, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3947-7909
Swen CarlstedtJena University Hospital, Institute of Biochemistry II, Am Klinikum 1, Jena, Germany.
Barbora MarsikovaLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, Albert-Einstein-Straβe 9, 07745, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8206-1549
Haoran WangLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, Albert-Einstein-Straβe 9, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Xavier UwurukundoLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, Albert-Einstein-Straβe 9, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Alexander S MosigJena University Hospital, Institute of Biochemistry II, Am Klinikum 1, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5687-2444
Rainer HeintzmannLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, Albert-Einstein-Straβe 9, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Leibniz Institute of Photonic Technology · DEHelmholtz Institute Jena · DEJena University Hospital · DE

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern microscopes used for biological imaging often present themselves as black boxes whose precise operating principle remains unknown, and whose optical resolution and price seem to be in inverse proportion to each other. With UC2 (You. See. Too.) we present a low-cost, 3D-printed, open-source, modular microscopy toolbox and demonstrate its versatility by realizing a complete microscope development cycle from concept to experimental phase. The self-contained incubator-enclosed brightfield microscope monitors monocyte to macrophage cell differentiation for seven days at cellular resolution level (e.g. 2 μm). Furthermore, by including very few additional components, the geometry is transferred into a 400 Euro light sheet fluorescence microscope for volumetric observations of a transgenic Zebrafish expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP). With this, we aim to establish an open standard in optics to facilitate interfacing with various complementary platforms. By making the content and comprehensive documentation publicly available, the systems presented here lend themselves to easy and straightforward replications, modifications, and extensions.

Identifiers

PMID33239615
PMCPMC7688980
OpenAlexW3109022162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.