Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33239578›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2020

Follow-Up for an Abnormal Newborn Screen for Severe Combined Immunodeficiencies (NBS SCID): A Clinical Immunology Society (CIS) Survey of Current Practices.

Vijaya Knight, Jennifer R Heimall, Nicola Wright, Cullen M Dutmer, Thomas G Boyce, Troy R Torgerson, Roshini S Abraham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Flow Cytometry Confirmation Post Newborn Screening for SCID in England.International journal of neonatal screening · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Vijaya KnightDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Jennifer R HeimallDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perlman School of Medicine at University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Nicola WrightDepartment of Pediatrics, Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T3B 6A8, Canada.
Cullen M DutmerDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Thomas G BoyceDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Marshfield Clinic, WI 54449, USA.
Troy R TorgersonExperimental Immunology, Allen Institute, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Roshini S AbrahamDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA.
Alberta Children's Hospital · CAAllen Institute · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USMarshfield Clinic · USNationwide Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) includes a group of monogenic disorders presenting with severe T cell lymphopenia (TCL) and high mortality, if untreated. The newborn screen (NBS) for SCID, included in the recommended universal screening panel (RUSP), has been widely adopted across the US and in many other countries. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding follow-up testing to confirm an abnormal result. The Clinical Immunology Society (CIS) membership was surveyed for confirmatory testing practices for an abnormal NBS SCID result, which included consideration of gestational age and birth weight, as well as flow cytometry panels. Considerable variability was observed in follow-up practices for an abnormal NBS SCID with 49% confirming by flow cytometry, 39% repeating TREC analysis, and the remainder either taking prematurity into consideration for subsequent testing or proceeding directly to genetic analysis. More than 50% of respondents did not take prematurity into consideration when determining follow-up. Confirmation of abnormal NBS SCID in premature infants continues to be challenging and is handled variably across centers, with some choosing to repeat NBS SCID testing until normal or until the infant reaches an adjusted gestational age of 37 weeks. A substantial proportion of respondents included naïve and memory T cell analysis with T, B, and NK lymphocyte subset quantitation in the initial confirmatory panel. These results have the potential to influence the diagnosis and management of an infant with TCL as illustrated by the clinical cases presented herein. Our data indicate that there is clearly a strong need for harmonization of follow-up testing for an abnormal NBS SCID result.

Indexed as

flow cytometrylymphocyte quantitationnaïve and memory T cellsnewborn screeningsevere combined immunodeficienciesTREC

Identifiers

PMID33239578
PMCPMC7569936
OpenAlexW3037518104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.