Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33239507›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2021

Reversal of the Pathophysiological Responses to Gram-Negative Sepsis by Megadose Vitamin C.

Yugeesh R Lankadeva, Rachel M Peiris, Nobuki Okazaki, Ian E Birchall, Anton Trask-Marino, Anthony Dornom, Tom A M Vale, Roger G Evans, Fumitaka Yanase, Rinaldo Bellomo and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Unravelling the paradox of vitamin C research in sepsis.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Rinaldo Bellomo: A clinician with a passion for preclinical research.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. An ovine septic shock model of live bacterial infusion.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yugeesh R LankadevaPreclinical Critical Care Unit, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rachel M PeirisPreclinical Critical Care Unit, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Nobuki OkazakiPreclinical Critical Care Unit, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ian E BirchallNeuropathology Laboratory, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Anton Trask-MarinoPreclinical Critical Care Unit, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Anthony DornomPreclinical Critical Care Unit, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Tom A M ValePreclinical Critical Care Unit, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Roger G EvansDepartment of Physiology, Cardiovascular Disease Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, VIC, Australia.
Fumitaka YanaseSchool of Medicine, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rinaldo BellomoCentre for Integrated Critical Care, Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Clive N MayPreclinical Critical Care Unit, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Austin Hospital · AUOkayama University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOxidative stress appears to initiate organ failure in sepsis, justifying treatment with antioxidants such as vitamin C at megadoses. We have therefore investigated the safety and efficacy of megadose sodium ascorbate in sepsis.

designInterventional study.

settingResearch Institute. SUBJECTS: Adult Merino ewes.

interventionsSheep were instrumented with pulmonary and renal artery flow-probes, and laser-Doppler and oxygen-sensing probes in the kidney. Conscious sheep received an infusion of live Escherichia coli for 31 hours. At 23.5 hours of sepsis, sheep received fluid resuscitation (30 mL/kg, Hartmann solution) and were randomized to IV sodium ascorbate (0.5 g/kg over 0.5 hr + 0.5 g/kg/hr for 6.5 hr; n = 5) or vehicle (n = 5). Norepinephrine was titrated to restore mean arterial pressure to baseline values (~80 mm Hg). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsSepsis-induced fever (41.4 ± 0.2°C; mean ± se), tachycardia (141 ± 2 beats/min), and a marked deterioration in clinical condition in all cases. Mean arterial pressure (86 ± 1 to 67 ± 2 mm Hg), arterial Po2 (102.1 ± 3.3 to 80.5 ± 3.4 mm Hg), and renal medullary tissue Po2 (41 ± 5 to 24 ± 2 mm Hg) decreased, and plasma creatinine doubled (71 ± 2 to 144 ± 15 µmol/L) (all p < 0.01). Direct observation indicated that in all animals, sodium ascorbate dramatically improved the clinical state, from malaise and lethargy to a responsive, alert state within 3 hours. Body temperature (39.3 ± 0.3°C), heart rate (99.7 ± 3 beats/min), and plasma creatinine (32.6 ± 5.8 µmol/L) all decreased. Arterial (96.5 ± 2.5 mm Hg) and renal medullary Po2 (48 ± 5 mm Hg) increased. The norepinephrine dose was decreased, to zero in four of five sheep, whereas mean arterial pressure increased (to 83 ± 2 mm Hg). We confirmed these physiologic findings in a coronavirus disease 2019 patient with shock by compassionate use of 60 g of sodium ascorbate over 7 hours.

conclusionsIV megadose sodium ascorbate reversed the pathophysiological and behavioral responses to Gram-negative sepsis without adverse side effects. Clinical studies are required to determine if such a dose has similar benefits in septic patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntioxidantsAscorbic AcidBacteremiaDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugEscherichia coli InfectionsSepsisSheepAntioxidantsAscorbic Acid

Identifiers

PMID33239507
PMCPMC7803449
OpenAlexW3108008784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.